2017
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1319843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local opinions on trophy hunting in Kyrgyzstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, trophy hunting generates few benefits for the local community [8,9], and income generated by trophy hunting is not distributed appropriately to the community helping in conservation of trophy animals [10,11]. A common problem with trophy hunting is lack of monitoring of trophy wildlife populations [12], resulting in improper population estimates [13] and improper quota for trophy hunting [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, trophy hunting generates few benefits for the local community [8,9], and income generated by trophy hunting is not distributed appropriately to the community helping in conservation of trophy animals [10,11]. A common problem with trophy hunting is lack of monitoring of trophy wildlife populations [12], resulting in improper population estimates [13] and improper quota for trophy hunting [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second prominent theme was the tangible and intangible benefits that some of the animals offered to humans. For example, in the case of the ibex, even though people traditionally hunted them for sport (like most ungulates), their utility was not limited to trophies alone but also linked to several economic and cultural dimensions (Nordbø et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is contingent on political conditions, such as the North-South divide, as well as specific social, cultural and environmental contexts (Baker, 1997;Mbaiwa, 2011Mbaiwa, , 2018Novelli et al, 2006). Trophy hunting is often seen as the most notorious form of international hunting tourism, and apart from divided or ambiguous views on its effects on the conservation of wildlife (Aryal, Morley, Cowan, & Ji, 2016), studies of local residents' and the public's views on trophy hunting and sport hunting in various parts of the world demonstrate underlying moral, social and political tensions (MacKay & Campbell, 2004;Mkono, 2019;Nordbø, Turdumambetov, & Gulcan, 2018). Trophy hunting and sport hunting is often associated with the wealthy, and hunting 'merely' for pleasure symbolizes asymmetrical power relations, sometimes with colonial connotations (Mkono, 2019) and a marketized, even itemised (Cohen, 2014) view of wildlife.…”
Section: Hunting Tourism As An Ambiguous Social Arenamentioning
confidence: 99%