Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1990.126041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local obstacle avoidance for mobile robots based on the method of artificial potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of modifying the entire path at once greatly reduced the problem of becoming trapped in a local minimum of the potential field, however, a collision-free path could still not be guaranteed. Tilove [TIL90].) Second, robots could often favor longer paths to travel around any closely spaced obstacles that they encountered, rather than simply pass untouched between them.…”
Section: Potential Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of modifying the entire path at once greatly reduced the problem of becoming trapped in a local minimum of the potential field, however, a collision-free path could still not be guaranteed. Tilove [TIL90].) Second, robots could often favor longer paths to travel around any closely spaced obstacles that they encountered, rather than simply pass untouched between them.…”
Section: Potential Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential fields present an efficient solution for local obstacle avoidance [13], though with the inherent limitations local minima and the inability to represent hard action constraints. The SPAR algorithm [9] describes a method combining binary constraints with linear objective functions to define a potential over the workspace, but is only used for navigation target selection rather than direct actions.…”
Section: A Multi-robot Role Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key module is the reactive method itself. Some techniques are based on potential methods [10,25,26], but they have limitations [27]. Other techniques compute a set of intermediate motion commands to choose the next one.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%