1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00438-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local multiplicity fluctuations in hadronic Z decay

Abstract: Local multiplicity uctuations in hadronic Z decays are studied using the l3 detector at lep. Bunching parameters are used for the rst time in addition to the normalised factorial moment method. The bunching parameters directly demonstrate that the uctuations in rapidity are multifractal. Monte Carlo models show agreement with the data, reproducing the trend, although not always the magnitude, of the factorial moments and bunching parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to nucleus collisions where it has not yet proved possible to observe correlations for groups of more than two particles. The fractal nature of the particle distributions in e + e − events has been also demonstrated [209] using the socalled bunching parameters [210,211].…”
Section: Multiplicity Of Three-jet Eventsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is in contrast to nucleus collisions where it has not yet proved possible to observe correlations for groups of more than two particles. The fractal nature of the particle distributions in e + e − events has been also demonstrated [209] using the socalled bunching parameters [210,211].…”
Section: Multiplicity Of Three-jet Eventsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such a correlation between space-time and momentum-energy is also a feature of the Lund string model, which, as incorporated in JETSET, is very successful in describing detailed features of the hadronic final states of e + e − annihilation. Not only inclusive single-particle distributions and event shapes, but also correlations [64][65][66] are well described.…”
Section: Time Dependence Of the Sourcementioning
confidence: 98%