2016
DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/06831357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local maximal operators on fractional Sobolev spaces

Abstract: Abstract. In this note we establish the boundedness properties of local maximal operators M G on the fractional Sobolev spaces W s,p (G) whenever G is an open set in R n , 0 < s < 1 and 1 < p < ∞. As an application, we characterize the fractional (s, p)-Hardy inequality on a bounded open set G by a Maz'ya-type testing condition localized to Whitney cubes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Theorem 1.1 generalizes a recently obtained boundedness result for the local Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator M dist(·,∂G) on fractional Sobolev spaces W s,p (G), see [37,Theorem 1.1]. Another interesting case is when R is an α-Hölder function (0 < α < 1) on a bounded open set G such that 0 ≤ R(x) ≤ dist(x, ∂G) for each x ∈ G. Corollary 5.6 then implies that…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, Theorem 1.1 generalizes a recently obtained boundedness result for the local Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator M dist(·,∂G) on fractional Sobolev spaces W s,p (G), see [37,Theorem 1.1]. Another interesting case is when R is an α-Hölder function (0 < α < 1) on a bounded open set G such that 0 ≤ R(x) ≤ dist(x, ∂G) for each x ∈ G. Corollary 5.6 then implies that…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Here delicate modifications are required in the proofs due to the A p weight and the R-function. In the sequel, we follow outline of the proof in [37]; in particular, we repeat many details therein without further notice.…”
Section: A Boundedness Results For M Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proofs in [18] were based on potential theoretic tools such as Harnack inequalities and the existence of capacitary potentials. In this paper, we use a different approach which combines and develops ideas from [9,12,14,20] and is better suited to the weighted (β = 0) case and to exponents q ≥ p. An important feature in the proof of Theorem 5.2 is the use of the so-called discrete convolution as a capacity test function. The definition of the discrete convolution is recalled in Section 4, where we also show that if u belongs to the Newtonian space N 1,p 0 (Ω), then a local maximal function of g u is a p-weak upper gradient of the discrete convolution u t .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the results in [18,Theorem 1] and [14,Theorem 10.52], the quasiadditivity property has been considered in the Euclidean space R n for instance in [2,3] for Riesz capacities, and in [9,20] (q = p) and [12] (q ≥ p) for fractional capacities with the help of fractional Hardy(-Sobolev) inequalities. Sufficient conditions for different versions of (weighted) Hardy and Hardy-Sobolev inequalities, and hence also for the corresponding quasiadditivity, have been given for example in [8,14,17,19,21]; see also the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%