2014
DOI: 10.1090/s0894-0347-2014-00788-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local limit theorem for symmetric random walks in Gromov-hyperbolic groups

Abstract: Completing a strategy of Gouëzel and Lalley [GL11], we prove a local limit theorem for the random walk generated by any symmetric finitely supported probability measure on a non-elementary Gromov-hyperbolic group: denoting by R the inverse of the spectral radius of the random walk, the probability to return to the identity at time n behaves like CR −n n −3/2 . An important step in the proof is to extend Ancona's results on the Martin boundary up to the spectral radius: we show that the Martin boundary for R-ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
137
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
6
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that context, what we called "Poisson kernel" bears the name "Martin kernel", and allows to represent all non-negative eigenfunctions by an integral of the kernel over the boundary. For Gromov-hyperbolic graphs, the coincidence of the Martin boundary with the geometric boundary has been proven in [3,4] in the interior of the positive spectrum, in [16,15] at the top of the positive spectrum, which coincides with the bottom of the ℓ 2 -spectrum. This relies highly on the fact that we are in a region where the Green function is positive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context, what we called "Poisson kernel" bears the name "Martin kernel", and allows to represent all non-negative eigenfunctions by an integral of the kernel over the boundary. For Gromov-hyperbolic graphs, the coincidence of the Martin boundary with the geometric boundary has been proven in [3,4] in the interior of the positive spectrum, in [16,15] at the top of the positive spectrum, which coincides with the bottom of the ℓ 2 -spectrum. This relies highly on the fact that we are in a region where the Green function is positive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we choose F = {a, b, a −1 } and 0 = 1. To the best of our knowledge, this result was first proved by Arzhantseva and Lysenok [3, Lemma 3] for hyperbolic groups, and reproved later in [38,Lemma 4.4] and [43,Lemma 2.4]. In joint work with Potyagailo [68], we have proved a version for relatively hyperbolic groups.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In fact, we expect Theorem 2 to hold in a much wider context, and that the emergence of the Brownian continuum random tree as a limit of large Brownian loops is a signature of non-compact, negatively curved spaces that are "close to homogeneous". The intuition behind this result comes from the recent advances [17,16] on local limit theorems for transition probabilities in hyperbolic groups. Namely, Gouëzel's results in [16] imply in particular that if G is a nonelementary Gromov-hyperbolic group, and if S is a finite symmetric subset of generators of G, then the number C n of closed paths of length n in the Cayley graph of G associated with S is asymptotically C n ∼ α β n n −3/2 (modulo the usual periodicity caveat) for some α = α(G, S) ∈ (0, ∞) and β = β(G, S) ∈ (1, ∞).…”
Section: Motivation Methods and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a first hint that a walk in G conditioned to come back at its starting point after n steps might approximate a tree in some sense. In fact, this general idea is present in the approach of [16].…”
Section: Motivation Methods and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%