Local Knowledge of Pond Fish-Farming Ecosystem Services: Management Implications of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Three Different Contexts (Brazil, France and Indonesia)

Mathé, Syndhia; Rey‐Valette, Hélène

doi:10.3390/su7067644

Cited by 33 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Its high recognition of heritage was an artefact of the highly developed oyster production systems in this region, which certain stakeholders associated with aquaculture. Additional details of stakeholder perceptions can be found in Mathé and Rey‐Valette ().…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Implementing ecological intensification in fish farming: definition and principles from contrasting experiences

Aubin

Callier

Rey‐Valette

et al. 2017

Reviews in Aquaculture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecological intensification is a new concept in agriculture that addresses the double challenge of maintaining a level of production sufficient to support needs of human populations and respecting the environment in order to conserve the natural world and human quality of life. This article adapts this concept to fish farming using agroecological principles and the ecosystem services framework. The method was developed from the study of published literature and applications at four study sites chosen for their differences in production intensity: polyculture ponds in France, integrated pig and pond polyculture in Brazil, the culture of striped catfish in Indonesia and a recirculating salmon aquaculture system in France. The study of stakeholders' perceptions of ecosystem services combined with environmental assessment through Life Cycle Assessment and Emergy accounting allowed development of an assessment tool that was used as a basis for co-building evolution scenarios. From this experience, ecological intensification of aquaculture was defined as the use of ecological processes and functions to increase productivity, strengthen ecosystem services and decrease disservices. It is based on aquaecosystem and biodiversity management and the use of local and traditional knowledge. Expected consequences for farming systems consist of greater autonomy, efficiency and better integration into their surrounding territories. Ecological intensification requires territorial governance and helps improve it from a sustainable development perspective.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To assess local knowledge and perceptions of ecosystem services, farmers and other stakeholders (Table ) were interviewed using semi‐structured questionnaires (Blayac et al . ; Mathé & Rey‐Valette ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing ecological intensification in fish farming: definition and principles from contrasting experiences

Aubin

Callier

Rey‐Valette

et al. 2017

Reviews in Aquaculture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CICES has no participatory component; however, it is possible to ask stakeholders to classify or distinguish the typology of the main ES of a specific aquaecosystem. Because the presence of an ES is due to its direct or indirect use, or the recognition of its value (Mathe and Rey-Valette, 2015), surveys can help to specify a suitable local ES typology from those in our typology (Blayac et al, 2014;Rey-Valette et al, 2017). The terminology used by Haines-Young, Potschin (2013) for the CICES may appear too technocratic for participatory approach with a wide diversity of stakeholders.…”

Section: Integration In the Eaamentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem service framework and typology for an ecosystem approach to aquaculture

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ecosystem approach to aquaculture (EAA) considers ecosystem services (ES) important, but does not provide a conceptual framework or a typology to integrate and assess them. To supplement the EAA, a literature review of the ES conceptual framework and ES typologies was combined with selected criteria from the EAA and ES literature. Eight criteria of transition from a conventional approach to aquaculture to the EAA were used as selection criteria to choose a conceptual framework of ES relevant with the EAA. To select a typology, we determined that ES must be distinguished from benefits, be a part of nature, be usable directly and indirectly, and not contain support or habitat ES. The conceptual framework of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is the most compatible with the EAA but does not provide an ES typology. The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) provides the ES typology most consistent with EAA criteria to supplement the conceptual framework. We identified 10 provisioning ES, 20 regulation and maintenance ES, and 11 cultural ES. Integration of the IPBES conceptual framework with the CICES typology preserves the generic approach of the EAA. This integration could highlight the main interactions among an aquaecosystem, its ES supply, its management, and its relevant stakeholders at multiple

show abstract

“…Studies are focused on the quantification of several regulation ES as a land-use function (Ditt et al, 2010;Ferraz et al, 2014;Grimaldi et al, 2014;LeClec'h et al, 2016;Mathé and Rey-Valette, 2015). They also involve estimates of soil loss (Tôsto and Pereira, 2015), sediment input into water resources (Chaves, 2010) and the definition of conservation areas (Duarte et al, 2016).…”

Section: Erosion Prevention and Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cultural Services are services related to the aesthetic, spiritual, educational and recreational benefits offered by ecosystems. The research found few studies that evaluated people's perception of ES and the relationship they have with their environment (Mathé and Rey-Valette, 2015;Oliveira and Berkes, 2014) and with ecological restoration projects (Brancalion et al, 2014). The studies apply qualitative (Pereira and Campos, 2009;Ribeiro and Ribeiro, 2016;Souza Filho et al, 2014) and quantitative evaluations (Mariano et al, 2015;Rares and Brandimarte, 2014) and economic valuation of ES (Mathé and Rey-Valette, 2015), to point out that aesthetic values and opportunities for recreation and tourism are the most commonly perceived ES.…”

Section: Cultural Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on ecosystem services in Brazil: a systematic review

Parron¹,

Fidalgo²,

Luz³

et al. 2019

Rev. ambiente água

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies using the ‘ecosystem services’ (ES) approach developed in Brazil based on the framework of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), and range from quantitative and qualitative evaluation to the development of economic instruments for payment for ecosystem services (PES) or compensation for their maintenance, mainly for hydrological services. In order to summarize current knowledge regarding ES, the structure for teaching in ES, and also to provide a basis for future research in Brazil, we carried out a systematic review of publications on ES and a study on the availability of undergraduate and graduate courses related to ES. We found 282 publications for the 2006-2017 period, which included peer-reviewed articles, books, book chapters, theses, dissertations, articles in annals and technical publications. We identified current knowledge, knowledge gaps and trends in ES researches that may guide surveys and scenario analyses for future studies, in different biomes and regions of the country. Atlantic Forest and Amazon are the most-studied biome. Most of the studies were related to the evaluation of different types of ES and to the development of methodologies for their evaluation and monitoring. The most common ES are related to biodiversity, carbon sequestration and water.

show abstract

Local Knowledge of Pond Fish-Farming Ecosystem Services: Management Implications of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Three Different Contexts (Brazil, France and Indonesia)

Cited by 33 publications

References 51 publications

Implementing ecological intensification in fish farming: definition and principles from contrasting experiences

Implementing ecological intensification in fish farming: definition and principles from contrasting experiences

Ecosystem service framework and typology for an ecosystem approach to aquaculture

Research on ecosystem services in Brazil: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About