Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.08.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local interfacial velocity measurement method using a four-sensor probe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xue developed a four‐point optical probe with appropriate data processing algorithm to obtain bubble velocity and size. Shen improved the four‐sensor probe methodology for the multidimensional two‐phase flow measurement. In recent years, double and tri‐sensor optical probe have also been applied to liquid–liquid two‐phase flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xue developed a four‐point optical probe with appropriate data processing algorithm to obtain bubble velocity and size. Shen improved the four‐sensor probe methodology for the multidimensional two‐phase flow measurement. In recent years, double and tri‐sensor optical probe have also been applied to liquid–liquid two‐phase flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, a four‐sensor optical probe with data processing algorithm has been used to determine the dispersed phase hydrodynamic characteristics in a pulsed sieve plate extraction column. This droplet velocity and diameter algorithms in liquid‐liquid two‐phase flow are based on the velocity model of Mishra, Lucas, and Shen . The influences of the pulsed intensity, the continuous and the dispersed phase superficial velocities on the hydrodynamic characteristics were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The averaged and maximum relative deviations of air superficial velocity, between the four-sensor probes and rotameter or flow controller, are 7.8% and 22.1%, so a very good agreement has been achieved for all flow conditions, as can it can be compared in the literature for similar works involving two-phase flow area-averaged based validations (Shen and Nakamura, 2013).…”
Section: Disperse Phase Area-averaged Local Flow Parameters and Probementioning
confidence: 61%
“…From the pioneer work of (Kataoka et al, 1986) on the local interfacial area derivation from velocity measurements, (Kim et al, 2001) proposed a miniaturized probe and made it capable of measuring both large and small bubbles. (Shen et al, 2005) and (Shen and Nakamura, 2013) proposed an explicit equation for the instantaneous local interfacial area and local interfacial velocity using four sensor conductivity probes, which take into account both receding and oncoming interfaces. Then, local values of IAC can be calculated as:…”
Section: C) Interfacial Area Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further verify the accuracy of the void fraction measurements by the differential pressure gauges, we compared them with local void fraction measurements by the optical multi-sensor probe method (Shen et al, 2005b, 2008a, 2008band Shen and Nakamura, 2013 and the X-type hot-film probe method (Bruun, 1995). The measurement errors in both comparisons are within ±10%.…”
Section: Experimental Conditions and Measurement Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%