2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2005.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local influence in measurement error models with ridge estimate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We first discuss the data raised from a study of pottery production and distribution in an Egyptian city. The detailed description can be found in [19,[33][34][35]. The data contain several mineral elements measured from samples of pottery made from different fabrics by two different techniques: neutron activation analysis (NAA) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometry.…”
Section: Egyptian Pottery Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first discuss the data raised from a study of pottery production and distribution in an Egyptian city. The detailed description can be found in [19,[33][34][35]. The data contain several mineral elements measured from samples of pottery made from different fabrics by two different techniques: neutron activation analysis (NAA) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometry.…”
Section: Egyptian Pottery Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billor et al (1999) studied the local influence of minor perturbations on the ridge estimate in the ordinary regression model using likelihood displacement. Rasekh (2006) assessed the local influence of observations on the ridge estimate in the measurement error models. Liu et al (2009) studied the local influence in the linear regression model with stochastic linear restriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying empirical influence function and Cook's statistic, they found that group number 5, 3, 13, and 19 were the most influence groups in model. Rasekh (2006) analysed the same data to detect influential observations on the ridge regression estimator using the local influence approach with minor perturbation on variance, six explanatory variables (Na, Al, K,V ,Cr and Mn). By the variance perturbation, He detected that groups 18, 23, 15 and 6 (imported vessels groups) are most influential groups in ridge measurement error regression.…”
Section: Egyptian Pottery Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rasekh and Feller (2003) derived influence function of ridge estimate in measurement error models using case deletion. Rasekh (2006) studied the local influence of minor perturbations on the ridge estimate in the ordinary regression model. He derived the diagnostics under the perturbation of variance and explanatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%