2017
DOI: 10.1101/135632
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex From Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI

Abstract: A central goal in systems neuroscience is the parcellation of the cerebral cortex into discrete neurobiological "atoms". Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) offers the possibility of in-vivo human cortical parcellation. Almost all previous parcellations relied on one of two approaches. The local gradient approach detects abrupt transitions in functional connectivity patterns. These transitions potentially reflect cortical areal boundaries defined by histology or visuotopic fMRI. By co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
951
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 491 publications
(979 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
19
951
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, RSFC is based on resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS‐fMRI), which measures spontaneous low‐frequency fluctuations in blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) signal in subjects at rest. RS‐fMRI has attracted attention for its ability to measure correlations in neural activity (via BOLD signal) between brain regions, regardless of their spatial proximity (Power et al, ; Schaefer et al, ), in order to identify co‐activation patterns among regions (i.e., networks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, RSFC is based on resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS‐fMRI), which measures spontaneous low‐frequency fluctuations in blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) signal in subjects at rest. RS‐fMRI has attracted attention for its ability to measure correlations in neural activity (via BOLD signal) between brain regions, regardless of their spatial proximity (Power et al, ; Schaefer et al, ), in order to identify co‐activation patterns among regions (i.e., networks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that researchers would directly project individual subjects’ fMRI data onto fsaverage surface space for group‐level analysis, and then project their results into MNI152 space for visualization. A more likely scenario might be the projection of surface‐based resting‐state fMRI cortical parcellations (Glasser et al, ; Gordon et al, 2016; Schaefer et al, ; Yeo et al, ) to MNI152 space. The projected resting‐state fMRI parcellation can then be utilized for analyzing new data from individual subjects registered to the MNI152 coordinate system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is a common practice for researchers to perform group analysis in MNI152 space, and then project the results to fsaverage space for visualization (Liu, Stufflebeam, Sepulcre, Hedden, & Buckner, ; Sepulcre et al, ; Yeo et al, ). As another example, resting‐state parcellations estimated in fsaverage or fs_LR surface coordinate systems (Glasser et al, ; Gordon et al, ; Schaefer et al, ; Yeo et al, ) can be projected to the MNI152 coordinate system for analyzing fMRI data of new subjects registered to the MNI152 template. Finally, a more accurate MNI152‐fsaverage mapping would facilitate the comparison of thousands of neuroimaging studies reported in either MNI152 or fsaverage coordinate system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the whole-brain topographic connectivity analysis, we made use of a previously published whole-brain parcellation atlas of 400 regions. The parcels were generated by maximizing correlations within a parcel while minimizing local changes in correlations within a parcel (Schaefer et al, 2018). For time and computational feasibility, we only used the 200 parcels of the right hemisphere.…”
Section: Regions Of Interest (Rois)mentioning
confidence: 99%