2008
DOI: 10.1080/13549830701668973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local food networks and maize agrodiversity conservation: two case studies from Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is also clear that participation in such strategies is limited, and made possible by land and agroclimatic endowments and, most likely, local economic conditions (see for example Saavedra & Rello, 2013). While the threshold for deriving a primary income from maize is high, it does not mean that smallholders are not continuing to derive some income from maize sales, or continue to produce some maize surplus: elsewhere we have shown that in the Chiapas and Mexico case studies, a substantial proportion of households (even with land areas that imply only subsistence production capacity) continue to sell maize in small quantities through local informal transactions (Eakin, Perales et al, 2014), an observation that is corroborated by others (Baker, 2008;Keleman, Rañ o et al, 2009;Lerner et al, 2013). Nevertheless, the more informal local markets to which farmers turn to sell their harvests do not appear to offer the stability or security of income needed for farmers to rely on this as a primary income source, irrespective of production volume.…”
Section: (C) Production and Economic Opportunitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Nevertheless, it is also clear that participation in such strategies is limited, and made possible by land and agroclimatic endowments and, most likely, local economic conditions (see for example Saavedra & Rello, 2013). While the threshold for deriving a primary income from maize is high, it does not mean that smallholders are not continuing to derive some income from maize sales, or continue to produce some maize surplus: elsewhere we have shown that in the Chiapas and Mexico case studies, a substantial proportion of households (even with land areas that imply only subsistence production capacity) continue to sell maize in small quantities through local informal transactions (Eakin, Perales et al, 2014), an observation that is corroborated by others (Baker, 2008;Keleman, Rañ o et al, 2009;Lerner et al, 2013). Nevertheless, the more informal local markets to which farmers turn to sell their harvests do not appear to offer the stability or security of income needed for farmers to rely on this as a primary income source, irrespective of production volume.…”
Section: (C) Production and Economic Opportunitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…1998). Criollo or local heirloom varieties of maize persist in various regions of Mexico to feed the demand in urban centres for ingredients of traditional dishes (Keleman and Hellin 2009; Baker 2008; Palerm 1997).…”
Section: Peri‐urban Livelihoods and Food Production Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, these seedbanks are insecure due to a lack of funds for seed maintenance under refrigerated conditions and for active manage- Baker, 2008;Pallante et al, 2016). There is also scope for farmer-driven seed sharing programmes and agricultural extension that facilitate on-farm conservation and use (see Pautasso et al, 2013).…”
Section: Conserving Agrodiversity As a Precondition For Plant Science Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%