2014
DOI: 10.1364/josab.31.002029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local field effects for spherical quantum dot emitters in the proximity of a planar dielectric interface

Abstract: We use numerical solutions of macroscopic Maxwell's equations to study spontaneous emission rates of model spherical quantum dot (QD) emitters in the vicinity of a highly polarizable dielectric substrate. It is demonstrated that extra polarization of the QD body taking place in the interfacial region may lead to appreciable deviations from the rates that would be expected under the assumption of a fixed magnitude of the effective QD transition dipole moment. Illustrations are given for both radiative and nonra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of ET is defined here as the fraction Γ ET /Γ of the ET rate Γ ET = Γ − Γ rad in the total electrodynamic decay rate Γ of the emitter, when the purely radiative decay rate Γ rad is subtracted. Figure 3(b) presents results derived for the interfaces between sapphire substrate and vacuum as well as between sapphire and the medium with refraction index 1.6 as representative 20 of the dense NQD films, comparing which illustrates the extra screening effect on NRET that the film’s own polarizability could have (no account of relatively small local field effects 13 47 was made here). As per Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of ET is defined here as the fraction Γ ET /Γ of the ET rate Γ ET = Γ − Γ rad in the total electrodynamic decay rate Γ of the emitter, when the purely radiative decay rate Γ rad is subtracted. Figure 3(b) presents results derived for the interfaces between sapphire substrate and vacuum as well as between sapphire and the medium with refraction index 1.6 as representative 20 of the dense NQD films, comparing which illustrates the extra screening effect on NRET that the film’s own polarizability could have (no account of relatively small local field effects 13 47 was made here). As per Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, materials such as MoS 2 , WS 2 , and InAs will show FRET that becomes weaker as the layer thickness is increased . Furthermore, Gartstein et al theoretically investigated and compared both macroscopic analyses by considering an acceptor slab having a complex dielectric function (i.e., CPS theory) and direct modeling, which considered discrete acceptor layers as polarizable point dipoles . In both models, non‐additivity (non‐monotonic behavior) in FRET efficiencies is observed as a function of the acceptor layer thickness, especially when the polarizability of the acceptor layer is relatively high (e.g., ε ′ > 7 and ε ″ = 0.2).…”
Section: Two‐dimensional Materials As Efficient Exciton Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall consider the QD emitter as a point dipole. (See [201] for discussion of possible effects beyond this approximation.) The radiative decay rate in the presence of other bodies is determined by the total field that acts on the emitter (created by itself and scattered by the bodies) and given by [78]…”
Section: Radiative Lifetime Near Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%