2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2012.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Evidence Aggregation for Regression-Based Facial Point Detection

Abstract: Abstract-We propose a new algorithm to detect facial points in frontal and near-frontal face images. It combines a regressionbased approach with a probabilistic graphical model-based face shape model, that restricts the search to anthropomorphically consistent regions. While most regression-based approaches perform a sequential approximation of the target location, our algorithm detects the target location by aggregating the estimates obtained from stochastically selected local appearance information into a si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed by [5], it is important to note that the curves of the works of [27] and [2] are hardly comparable as they re-annotated some of the data. Fig.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed by [5], it is important to note that the curves of the works of [27] and [2] are hardly comparable as they re-annotated some of the data. Fig.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a particularly challenging dataset as it is captured under cluttered backgrounds and various real-world illumination environments. We thus compare our system with several recent methods: the original CLM from [11], LEAR from [27], BoRMaN from [46], STASM from [30] and the system of [2] and [14]. For a fair comparison, we use the error measure for only 17 points, as [11] explains.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We first report the comparison results on the BioID Dataset [9]. Figure 13 shows the face alignment results of LFCR, Stasm [2], FaceTracker [4], BoRMaN [32], and LEAR [33]. From the figure, we can observe that LFCR performs the best, followed by Stasm, FaceTracker, LEAR, and BoRMaN.…”
Section: Comparison To State Of the Artsmentioning
confidence: 99%