2013
DOI: 10.1177/0003122413514750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Ethnic Composition and Natives’ and Immigrants’ Geographic Mobility in France, 1982–1999

Abstract: This article provides empirical results on patterns of native and immigrant geographic mobility in France. Using longitudinal data, we measure mobility from one French municipality (commune) to another over time and estimate the effect of the initial municipality's ethnic composition on the probability of moving out. These data allow us to use panel techniques to correct for biases related to selection based on geographic and individual unobservables. Our findings tend to discredit the hypothesis of a -white f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most models showed a strong positive effect of the neighbourhood immigrant share on the majority's out‐migration, this trend was not confirmed in models controlling for neighbourhood fixed effects. This result mirrors that of Rathelot and Safi (), who also find an insignificant effect of the immigrant share in models controlling for geographic heterogeneity. A possible interpretation of this finding lies in the racial proxy hypothesis: The majority may be more likely to leave these neighbourhoods not specifically because of their immigrant composition, but rather due to other attributes of the spaces in which immigrants are concentrated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although most models showed a strong positive effect of the neighbourhood immigrant share on the majority's out‐migration, this trend was not confirmed in models controlling for neighbourhood fixed effects. This result mirrors that of Rathelot and Safi (), who also find an insignificant effect of the immigrant share in models controlling for geographic heterogeneity. A possible interpretation of this finding lies in the racial proxy hypothesis: The majority may be more likely to leave these neighbourhoods not specifically because of their immigrant composition, but rather due to other attributes of the spaces in which immigrants are concentrated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The findings broadly suggest that local ethnoracial context is a significant predictor of mobility among immigrants and the majority, albeit in diverging ways. A negative effect of the local share of coethnics on moving out of the neighbourhood was consistently found for first generation immigrants, and second generation immigrants in most models, confirming place stratification's emphasis on ethnic clustering patterns (H1) and prior evidence from France at the municipality level (Rathelot & Safi, ). Moreover, variation within the immigrant population linked to occupation and family size did not weaken the ethnic clustering effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…La razón principal de ello es que la población autóctona representa progresivamente una proporción menor de la población total (96,9% en el año 2000, 85,6% en el 2014). No obstante, otra posible explicación paralela a la anterior podría resultar de procesos de despoblamiento de aquellos barrios o zonas de las ciudades con un importante aumento de la población extranjera por parte de los nacionales, a causa de lo que se conoce como White flight (Frey y Liaw, 1998) o Ethnic avoidance (Rathelot y Safi, 2014) o simplemente por el envejecimiento de la población, provocando que los españoles se encuentren cada vez menos en sus áreas de residencia con los marroquíes y el resto de extranjeros.…”
Section: La Evolución De La Segregación Residencial 2000-2014unclassified