2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10458-019-09417-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local envy-freeness in house allocation problems

Abstract: We study the fair division problem consisting in allocating one item per agent so as to avoid (or minimize) envy, in a setting where only agents connected in a given social network may experience envy. In a variant of the problem, agents themselves can be located on the network by the central authority. These problems turn out to be difficult even on very simple graph structures, but we identify several tractable cases. We further provide practical algorithms and experimental insights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now turn to the literature in the context of indivisible items. Beynier et al [5] study the fair division problem in the setting of "house allocation": here agents have (strict) preferences over items, and each agent must receive exactly one item. An agent envies another in this setting if she prefers the item received by the other agent over her own.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now turn to the literature in the context of indivisible items. Beynier et al [5] study the fair division problem in the setting of "house allocation": here agents have (strict) preferences over items, and each agent must receive exactly one item. An agent envies another in this setting if she prefers the item received by the other agent over her own.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another related line of work considers settings where the agents constitute a social network and can only observe the allocations of their neighbors (Abebe, Kleinberg, and Parkes 2017;Bei, Qiao, and Zhang 2017;Chevaleyre, Endriss, and Maudet 2017;Aziz et al 2018;Beynier et al 2018;Bredereck, Kaczmarczyk, and Niedermeier 2018). These works place an informational constraint on the set of agents, whereas our model restricts the set of revealed goods per agent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) in LOCALLY ENVY-FREE ALLOCATION (LEFA) each agent a is satisfied if it does not envy any of its neighborsthis models situations where agents do not know or care about the total available amount of resources. This was studied, e.g., by Beynier et al (2019) and Bredereck et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Envy-freeness ranks among the most important fairness requirements in the classical resource allocation problem of distributing indivisible items (resources) among agents (Bouveret and Lang 2008;Bouveret, Chevaleyre, and Maudet 2016). There has also been an extensive line of works studying envy-freeness in a more general setting where agents only directly compare themselves to a subset of other agents (Beynier et al 2019;Aziz et al 2018;Bredereck, Kaczmarczyk, and Niedermeier 2018). For instance, employees in a company would only compare themselves and "envy" other employees that are at a comparable level to them in the company's hierarchy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%