1992
DOI: 10.1080/00420989220080481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Economic Development and the City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to some policy analysts (Bartik 1990;Bovaird 1992), state and local governments use development policies to correct private market failures, such as involuntary unemployment and underemployment, and restructure a local economy. The increasing use of development programs in the 1980s perhaps attributed to the rise in unemployment in certain localities.…”
Section: Data and Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some policy analysts (Bartik 1990;Bovaird 1992), state and local governments use development policies to correct private market failures, such as involuntary unemployment and underemployment, and restructure a local economy. The increasing use of development programs in the 1980s perhaps attributed to the rise in unemployment in certain localities.…”
Section: Data and Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, all three categories of councils are heavily involved in these initiatives. Table 1 strongly bears out the results of earlier studies on the continued popularity of local council involvement in sites and premises policy (Mills and Young, 1986;Sellgren, 1987Sellgren, , 1989Sellgren, , 1991Bovaird, 1992). The provision of sites as a policy seems to have stabilized in terms of the numbers of councils involved (Armstrong and Izadi, 1994).…”
Section: T H E D a T A S E T U T I L I Z E Dmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This occurs against a backdrop in which the central state itself is dealing with an ongoing redefinition of its powers and role within advanced capitalism (Pooley, 1991;Tickell and Peck, 1992). As the discussion of Newcastle's experience reveals, these redefinitions have exposed the scope for clashes of local priorities with state and national agendas (Bovaird, 1992).…”
Section: The Emergence Of the Entrepreneurial Citymentioning
confidence: 99%