2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.012315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local distinguishability of orthogonal23pure states

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where |φ ⊥ d is defined by Eq. (48). By the definitions, we have cos θ = ψ|φ d , sin θ = ψ|φ ⊥ d , cos ξ = ψ|φ d /r,…”
Section: Derivation Of Analytical Solutions Of X ǫ (|ψ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where |φ ⊥ d is defined by Eq. (48). By the definitions, we have cos θ = ψ|φ d , sin θ = ψ|φ ⊥ d , cos ξ = ψ|φ d /r,…”
Section: Derivation Of Analytical Solutions Of X ǫ (|ψ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has attracted much interest in recent years, but progress has been slowed by the abundance of special cases lurking in Hilbert space. Results have been restricted mostly to low dimensional systems, specific multipartite structures, and small numbers of states [22,23,24,25]. These limitations are overcome for random states, which allow us to provide a complete generic solution for the unambiguous local distinguishability of pure states, over all multipartite quantum systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that a set of quantum pure states are unambiguously discriminable if and only if they are linearly independent [6]. Furthermore, many variations of state discrimination problem such as local discrimination, discrimination of mixed states, discrimination of multipartite quantum states, minimum-error discrimination and asymptotic discrimination were proposed and have attracted much attention [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [? ], [?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%