2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.101.023110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local details versus effective medium approximation: A study of diffusion in microfluidic random networks made from Voronoi tessellations

Abstract: We measured the effective diffusion coefficient in regions of microfluidic networks of controlled geometry using the FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) technique. The geometry of the networks was based on Voronoi tessellations, and had varying characteristic length scale and porosity. For a fixed network, FRAP experiments were performed in regions of increasing size. Our results indicate that the boundary of the bleached region, and in particular the cumulative area of the channels that connect … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The devices consisted of an inoculation chamber, a region with a network of narrow, randomly oriented channels, and an exit chamber. The network was designed in Matlab as a Voronoi tessellation, obtained from N = 3000 seed points within a region of A = 2 × 1 (arbitrary units) (27; 28). To generate a disordered network, these points were required to be at least 0.3 d 0 units apart, where would be the distance between the seed points in a completely regular network (a honeycomb network), but other than that they were randomly generated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The devices consisted of an inoculation chamber, a region with a network of narrow, randomly oriented channels, and an exit chamber. The network was designed in Matlab as a Voronoi tessellation, obtained from N = 3000 seed points within a region of A = 2 × 1 (arbitrary units) (27; 28). To generate a disordered network, these points were required to be at least 0.3 d 0 units apart, where would be the distance between the seed points in a completely regular network (a honeycomb network), but other than that they were randomly generated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%