2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2013.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local descriptors and similarity measures for frontal face recognition: A comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these radial polynomials used corresponds to a different characteristic of the image [57]. In problems such as face recognition, rather than the holistic characterization of images, local statistics have more importance [14]. Therefore, the local Zernike moments (LZM) [39] transformation was proposed to extract local variations by calculating these moments around each pixel on the face images.…”
Section: Local Zernike Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these radial polynomials used corresponds to a different characteristic of the image [57]. In problems such as face recognition, rather than the holistic characterization of images, local statistics have more importance [14]. Therefore, the local Zernike moments (LZM) [39] transformation was proposed to extract local variations by calculating these moments around each pixel on the face images.…”
Section: Local Zernike Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the classification system performs hypothesis testing (or one-class classification) using a single reference face image per target individual. Template matching algorithms employ each facial model defined as a set of one or more templates stored in a gallery [6], [9]. It is also possible to consider a one-class classifier like Gaussian mixture modeling [29] or one-class SVMs [60] to learn from an abundance of non-target class samples that are somehow similar to the single target class sample.…”
Section: Face Classification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, uniform non-overlapping patches are isolated in the reference ROI to improve robustness to occlusion [34]. Local Binary Pattern (LBP), Local Phase Quantization (LPQ), Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), and Haar features are considered to extract information from patches to provide robustness to local changes in illumination, blur, etc [2], [3], [9], [16]. During operations, ROIs of faces captured in videos are classified by each individual-specific ensemble of the system, and the ensemble scores are combined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, many (non metric) parametric dissimilarity measures could be designed depending on the specific task. Recently, there is a steady increasing interest in using several, possibly heterogeneous, dissimilarity measures at the same time [28,40,41,8,24]. Regardless of the number of dissimilarity measures, the setting of their characterizing parameters is what really allows to discover the relevant information hidden in the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given dissimilarity measure, it is possible to distinguish two main approaches [35]: those trying to determine a partition of data, and those that focus on searching for isolated clusters surrounded by uncategorized data. Local description of data is of particular interest, since it allows to characterize the input data by means of a heterogeneous collection of descriptions [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%