2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local De Novo Assembly of RAD Paired-End Contigs Using Short Sequencing Reads

Abstract: Despite the power of massively parallel sequencing platforms, a drawback is the short length of the sequence reads produced. We demonstrate that short reads can be locally assembled into longer contigs using paired-end sequencing of restriction-site associated DNA (RAD-PE) fragments. We use this RAD-PE contig approach to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and determine haplotype structure in threespine stickleback and to sequence E. coli and stickleback genomic DNA with overlapping contigs of seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
218
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RAD‐seq libraries were prepared as described by Etter, Preston, Bassham, Cresko, and Johnson (2011b; see also Etter, Bassham, Hohenlohe, Johnson, & Cresko, 2011a with modifications). All samples were normalized to 25 ng/μl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAD‐seq libraries were prepared as described by Etter, Preston, Bassham, Cresko, and Johnson (2011b; see also Etter, Bassham, Hohenlohe, Johnson, & Cresko, 2011a with modifications). All samples were normalized to 25 ng/μl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For subsequent analyses, only the first (left) paired-read was used. The DNA fragments created by RAD tag library preparation have a restriction site at one end and are randomly sheared at the other end that results in each instance of a restriction site sequence being sampled many times by the first reads and the genomic DNA sequence in the nearby region being randomly sampled at a lower coverage by the second paired-end reads (Etter et al, 2011), which are therefore less suitable for calling SNPs.…”
Section: Rad Tag Sequencing Rad Data Analysis and Snp Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pilot study to inform the choice of restriction enzyme(s) was therefore carried out in which the DNA of two parents and 20 offspring from the full-sib family was digested using the following four restriction enzymes; two 8-base pair (bp) (Sbfl and SgrAl) and two 6-bp (Pstl and Xmal). Using the methods described by Etter et al (2011) RADseq libraries were prepared for each enzyme using the size range selection of 300 to 700-bp. To get a better coverage of the parents, we used a ratio of five times the amount of parental DNA relative to offspring DNA in order to achieve a 5-fold increase in the number of Illumina reads for the parental samples compared to those for each offspring.…”
Section: Primary Digestion: Selection Of Restriction Enzymementioning
confidence: 99%