2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local damage evaluation of a laminate composite plate using ultrasonic birefringence of shear wave

Abstract: This paper presents an ultrasonic non-destructive testing method to locally characterize composite material damage through the analysis of the anisotropy behavior variation induced by damage. The approach is based on shear wave contact measurements and analyses shear wave birefringence to estimate variation of the attenuation coefficient and shear moduli ratio between warp and weft directions. The method only requires a single piezo-electric contact sensor and thus, is easy to implement for practical applicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study's transition zone between the high-velocity zone and the low-velocity zone is very narrow and not obvious. In addition, the shear wave velocity V 12 (90 • ) is lower than V 13 (0 and 180 • ), showing an obvious shear wave birefringence [28,29]. This difference may be due to the interaction between shear waves and typical internal layered structures of SLM samples.…”
Section: Wave Velocity In Different Directionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, this study's transition zone between the high-velocity zone and the low-velocity zone is very narrow and not obvious. In addition, the shear wave velocity V 12 (90 • ) is lower than V 13 (0 and 180 • ), showing an obvious shear wave birefringence [28,29]. This difference may be due to the interaction between shear waves and typical internal layered structures of SLM samples.…”
Section: Wave Velocity In Different Directionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The matrix, reinforcement, and interface are indeed the three essentially key phases that make up GFRP composites [27]. Impact damage, which commonly presents as delamination, matrix cracking, and fiber failure, can significantly diminish structural strength and stability [28][29][30]. Due to the unstable resin and inadequate curing methods, voids and porosities are among the most frequent flaws that develop during the composite preparation.…”
Section: Characterization Of Mechanical Properties and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decomposition results make it possible to calculate the reliability and failure mode characteristics according to Equations (41)- (44). Figure 9 shows the fraction of the AE events according to Equation (43) belonging to the four damage modes (D1,…,D4) at different load times. The vertical dotted blue and red lines indicate the time of the peak force (t*) and the upper limit (tAE) of the duration of detecting the signal amplitude and energy respectively.…”
Section: Glass Fiber Reinforced Pp Compositementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility to locate damages and characterize their geometry is provided by the ultrasonic non-destructive testing method using the analysis of the damage-induced anisotropy based on measuring quasi-static indentation 42 or shear wave birefringence. 43 The accuracy of measuring damage size has also been analyzed using different ultrasonic testing modes. 44…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%