1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf01581723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local convergence of predictor—corrector infeasible-interior-point algorithms for SDPs and SDLCPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our paths are defined by fields of search directions which decide the convergence behavior of an IPM, the bad behavior (not being analytic and having unbounded derivative if y 2 = −y 1 in the example) of the underlying paths strongly indicates slow convergence of IPM near a solution to a SDLCP. Kojima, et al, [9] observed certain evidence that IPMs do not converge superlinearly without "shrinking" the neighborhood using the HKM direction. Through the analysis of underlying paths here, we provide further evidence which anticipates the slow local convergence of IPMs for SDP and SDLCP using the HKM direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since our paths are defined by fields of search directions which decide the convergence behavior of an IPM, the bad behavior (not being analytic and having unbounded derivative if y 2 = −y 1 in the example) of the underlying paths strongly indicates slow convergence of IPM near a solution to a SDLCP. Kojima, et al, [9] observed certain evidence that IPMs do not converge superlinearly without "shrinking" the neighborhood using the HKM direction. Through the analysis of underlying paths here, we provide further evidence which anticipates the slow local convergence of IPMs for SDP and SDLCP using the HKM direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What we discussed below using this example, however, is not directly related to its discussion in [9].…”
Section: Qedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations