2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15928-2_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Confluence for Rules with Nested Application Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We give a short review of nested application conditions before we demonstrate that conditions can be moved freely between left and right-hand sides of rules as in previous work on dpo rewriting with linear rules [13,10]. Before we recall the full definition of nacs, we informally describe a simple example.…”
Section: On Nested Application Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We give a short review of nested application conditions before we demonstrate that conditions can be moved freely between left and right-hand sides of rules as in previous work on dpo rewriting with linear rules [13,10]. Before we recall the full definition of nacs, we informally describe a simple example.…”
Section: On Nested Application Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kappa also supports a quantitative analysis that approximates the evolution of the expected number of occurrences of a given set of observable graphs over time using a system of differential equations [5]; if we want to formalise observables as graphs with a nac, we also need to keep track of the change in their occurrence counts for this quantitative analysis. This is the point where the shifting constructions for nacs as formulated in the literature [13,10] are the tool of choice. One might also consider extending this type of quantitative analysis to process calculi (via graphical encodings), in which case merging rules, as supported by the sqpo approach, become relevant, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if p 0 is the empty rule, this is the Parallelism Theorem in [16], since the transformations are parallel independent for an empty kernel match. p0, m0 p1, m1 p2, m2 p1, m3 Fig.…”
Section: Theorem 2 (Multi-amalgamation) Consider a Bundle Of Kernel mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have that p 1 ∼ = p 0 * E p 1 . The analysis part of the Concurrency Theorem [16] now implies the decomposition into G = p0,m0…”
Section: Definition 2 (Complement Rule) Given Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation