2018
DOI: 10.1101/346916
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local-community network automata modelling based on length-three-paths for prediction of complex network structures in protein interactomes, food webs and more

Abstract: From nests to nets intricate wiring diagrams surround the birth and the death of life. Here we show that the same rule of complex network self-organization is valid across different physical scales and allows to predict protein interactions, food web trophic relations and world trade network transitions. This rule, which we named CH2-L3, is a network automaton that is based on paths of length-three and that maximizes internal links in local communities and minimizes external ones, according to a mechanistic mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(39 reference statements)
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3d) the ranking of the methods is similar to the one seen in Football (Fig. 3a), with L3 methods as best performing (in agreement with link prediction results of Muscoloni et al 28 ), followed by CH-L2 methods (CH2-L2, CH3-L2 and RA-L2), and then by the other L2-based predictors (in agreement with the results of Cannistraci 32 , discussing the importance of minimizing external links in PPI networks). We confirm that also in our tests L3-methods overcome L2-methods as reported in previous literature by Kovács et al 29 .…”
Section: Hyperedge Entanglement Predictor (Hep)supporting
confidence: 83%
“…3d) the ranking of the methods is similar to the one seen in Football (Fig. 3a), with L3 methods as best performing (in agreement with link prediction results of Muscoloni et al 28 ), followed by CH-L2 methods (CH2-L2, CH3-L2 and RA-L2), and then by the other L2-based predictors (in agreement with the results of Cannistraci 32 , discussing the importance of minimizing external links in PPI networks). We confirm that also in our tests L3-methods overcome L2-methods as reported in previous literature by Kovács et al 29 .…”
Section: Hyperedge Entanglement Predictor (Hep)supporting
confidence: 83%
“…These common characteristics have inspired scholars to study PPI networks in the way of studying social networks. These methodologies are mainly divided into three categories: neighborhood-based or paths-based approaches (Cannistraci et al, 2013;Huang et al, 2017;Muscoloni et al, 2018;Kovács et al, 2019;Pech et al, 2019), hierarchical clustering approaches (Clauset et al, 2008;Symeonidis et al, 2013), and random walkbased approaches (Lichtenwalter et al, 2010;Backstrom and Leskovec, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the principle that people tend to build relationships with people who are close to them in social networks cannot explain the interaction of two proteins. Therefore, some scholars (Muscoloni et al, 2018;Kovács et al, 2019;Pech et al, 2019) attempt to explain the link mechanism of PPI networks with 3-hop paths rather than 2-hop paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the above embedding techniques, we also compare our embedding model with 5 state-of-the-art network structure-based link prediction algorithms, including common neighbors (CN), preferential attachment (PA), Adamic Adar (AA), L 3 principle [17] as well as its higher-order extension (CH2-L3) [18].…”
Section: Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of simple yet efficient approaches for link prediction is called network structured-based algorithms, rooted in social network analysis. Network structure-based algorithms [13][14][15][16][17][18] such as common neighbors (CN), preferential attachment (PA), Adamic-Adar (AA) and the number of 3-hop paths (L 3 ), which assign a likelihood score to all candidate links (i.e., non-connected node pairs) and rank these unknown links according to their scores. Due to the simplicity and low computational complexity of network-based algorithms, they have obtained wide practical uses (e.g., Identification of novel protein interactions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%