2018
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2018.2812148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Community Detection With the Dynamic Membership Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], the authors proposed a three-phase method to detect the local community to which a network node belongs, without requiring the global information of the network. In each phase, the dynamic membership function depends on the number of nodes from the local community, and which neighboring nodes belong to the community is determined by a formula.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the authors proposed a three-phase method to detect the local community to which a network node belongs, without requiring the global information of the network. In each phase, the dynamic membership function depends on the number of nodes from the local community, and which neighboring nodes belong to the community is determined by a formula.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…end if 48: end while 49: return C n is the number of nodes, k is the average degree of the nodes, k max is the maximum degree of the nodes, c min is the minimum number of members in the community, c max is the maximum number of members in the community, µ is mixing parameter that control the fuzziness of the community, t 1 is minus exponent for the degree sequence, t 2 is minus exponent for the community size distribution, on is the number of overlapping nodes, and om is the number of memberships of the overlapping nodes. By setting the same parameters as in [52], four small networks and two large networks are generated as follows: • LFR_S4: n = 1000, k = 7, k max = 25, c min = 10, c max = 300, µ = 0.1, t 1 = 2, t 2 = 1, on = 0, om = 0.…”
Section: A Random Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, we have followed up to the local community detection algorithms that include DMF_M1, DMF_M2, and DMF_M proposed in [52], and the M algorithm proposed in [21]. To compare the performance of these algorithms, experiments are carried out by using the aforementioned generated networks, and the comparison of the experimental results given by each algorithm are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: A Random Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then a CS-based detection algorithm was proposed to detect the intercommunity links. Luo et al [52] analyzed the formation of the local community and proposed two local community detection algorithms based on the dynamic membership function. Each of the algorithms is divided into three stages: 1) the initial stage, 2) the middle stage, and 3) the closing stage.…”
Section: B Community Detection Of Mobile Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%