2021
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local canopy disturbance as an explanation for long‐term increases in liana abundance

Abstract: Canopy disturbance explains liana abundance and distribution within tropical forests and thus may also explain the widespread pattern of increasing liana abundance; however, this hypothesis remains untested. We used a 10‐year study (2007–2017) of 117,100 rooted lianas in an old‐growth Panamanian forest to test whether local canopy disturbance explains increasing liana abundance. We found that liana density increased 29.2% and basal area 12.5%. The vast majority of these increases were associated with clonal st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in productivity found in this model was mostly driven by the capacity of lianas to strongly compete for water and light (Meunier et al, 2021). Given that climate change may be accelerating tree mortality (Mcdowell et al, 2018), and that lianas increase in density and basal area in disturbed areas created by tree falls (Ledo et al, 2016;Schnitzer et al, 2021), it is necessary to include the detrimental effects that lianas exert on forest growth and biomass accretion we quantified in this meta-analysis in future vegetation models.…”
Section: Effects Of Lianas On Tree Growth and Biomass Accretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction in productivity found in this model was mostly driven by the capacity of lianas to strongly compete for water and light (Meunier et al, 2021). Given that climate change may be accelerating tree mortality (Mcdowell et al, 2018), and that lianas increase in density and basal area in disturbed areas created by tree falls (Ledo et al, 2016;Schnitzer et al, 2021), it is necessary to include the detrimental effects that lianas exert on forest growth and biomass accretion we quantified in this meta-analysis in future vegetation models.…”
Section: Effects Of Lianas On Tree Growth and Biomass Accretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, lianas likely have a stronger detrimental effect on trees in areas where they are more abundant, assuming that their effect on trees scales with their abundance. Given that there are now 16 studies indicating that liana density, productivity, and biomass are all increasing relative to trees in tropical forests (Pandian and Parthasarathy, 2016;Ceballos and Malizia, 2017;Hogan et al, 2017;Venegas-González et al, 2020;Schnitzer et al, 2021), it is paramount to determine the magnitude at which lianas reduce tree performance and forest biomass, and how these effects change along important environmental gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lianas themselves contributed very little to the carbon they displaced (Estrada‐Villegas, Hall, et al, 2020; van der Heijden et al, 2015; Lai et al, 2017). The relatively small contribution of lianas to forest‐level carbon results from their low stem volume (Schnitzer et al, 2012, 2021), slow accumulation of biomass (Letcher & Chazdon, 2009), and their greater allocation of above‐ground biomass to leaves than to the stem than similar‐sized trees, which lowers their capacity to store carbon (Chave et al, 2001; Gerwing & Farias, 2000; Putz, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, high liana abundance in young forests (e.g. 40 years and younger) (Barry et al, 2015; Dewalt et al, 2000; Schnitzer et al, 2012, 2021) reduce tree growth and biomass accumulation (Estrada‐Villegas, Hall, et al, 2020). Therefore, the negative effects of lianas on tree‐tree competition and forest thinning may be particularly important in the early stages of forest succession, where lianas likely reduce the potential of secondary forests to sequester carbon (Poorter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation