2005
DOI: 10.1205/cherd.04122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Bubble Size Distributions in Agitated Vessel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Auch ist das Sammeln im Trichter nicht unproblematisch und experimentelles Geschick erforderlich . In den vergangenen Jahrzehnten haben zahlreiche Autoren diese Messtechnik erfolgreich eingesetzt und auch mit bildgebenden Verfahren gekoppelt .…”
Section: Messmethodenunclassified
“…Auch ist das Sammeln im Trichter nicht unproblematisch und experimentelles Geschick erforderlich . In den vergangenen Jahrzehnten haben zahlreiche Autoren diese Messtechnik erfolgreich eingesetzt und auch mit bildgebenden Verfahren gekoppelt .…”
Section: Messmethodenunclassified
“…The embedded m-loops correspond to iterative flux/defect correction for the involved convection-diffusion operators. In the case of an implicit time discretization, subproblem (23)(24) leads to a sequence of algebraic systems of the form [21,23,46] …”
Section: Integration Of Pbe Into Cfdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, two more studies are examined: the first example has been taken from the study by [24] for high dissipation rate values, and the latter one has been taken from the study of Olmos and his colleagues [37] for low values of dissipation rate.…”
Section: Validation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both these methods have been extensively reported in the literature -some of the intrusive methods employ capillary suction probes (Laakkonen et al, 2005), conductivity probes (Liu and Bankoff, 1993), optical fiber probes (Saberi et al, 1995) and wire-mesh sensors (Prasser, 2008), etc. The non-intrusive methods include interferometric particle imaging (Glover et al, 1995), laser Doppler velocimetry (Mudde et al, 1998), extinction and scattering activity measurement (Zaidi, 1998), phase Doppler anemometry (Laakkonen et al, 2005) and other particle-imaging techniques (Tayali and Bates, 1990;Adrian, 1991;Grant, 1997), etc. In general, non-intrusive methods are Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ces preferred over intrusive methods which disturb the local flow fields because of the placement of the probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%