2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.06458
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Banach-space dichotomies and ergodic spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two properties show that X eh is an ℓ 2 saturated d 2 -H.I. space, a class of Banach spaces defined recently by W. Cuellar Carrera, N. de Rancourt and V. Ferenczi in [16]. Our aim in the present paper is to present James Tree spaces containing ℓ 2 and satisfying the property that every Hilbertian subspace is complemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These two properties show that X eh is an ℓ 2 saturated d 2 -H.I. space, a class of Banach spaces defined recently by W. Cuellar Carrera, N. de Rancourt and V. Ferenczi in [16]. Our aim in the present paper is to present James Tree spaces containing ℓ 2 and satisfying the property that every Hilbertian subspace is complemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Important contributions to the program have been made by V. Ferenczi and C. Rosendal [18], [19], [20]. Recently, in [16], W. Cuellar Carrera, N. de Rancourt and V. Ferenczi initiated a theory of classifying Banach spaces with respect to the properties of their subspaces restricted within a predetermined class. The class of non-Hilbertian spaces is of particular interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given a family H, the restricted Gowers game G H [X] played below an X ∈ H is defined exactly as G[X], except that we require I's moves to be from H ↾ X. This game has been extensively studied by Noé de Rancourt and coauthors, see [5] and [6]. It enables a variation of Theorem 1.4 for (p)-families without the extra assumption of being full, at the expense of weakening the conclusion for II from G[X] to G H [X] (Theorem 3.3 in [6]).…”
Section: Proof Fix a Recursive Bijectionmentioning
confidence: 99%