2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000105536.65164.b1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Autograft Bone in the Surgical Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Abstract: In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery, local autograft bone allows to avoid the necessity of any over graft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful fusion has been reported using local bone alone for long posterolateral fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [10]. Local in situ autografts in instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lower lumbar or lumbosacral spine for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis have been evaluated [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful fusion has been reported using local bone alone for long posterolateral fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [10]. Local in situ autografts in instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lower lumbar or lumbosacral spine for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis have been evaluated [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With iliac crest bone harvest, various authors have reported on the occurrence of major or minor complications ranging from 1 to 39 %, which include hematoma, infection, prolonged chronic pain and sensory deficit [6][7][8] Recently local bone obtained through laminectomy has been reportedly used as standalone graft in PLIF procedures showing comparable fusion rates to autologous iliac bone. If true, this could potentially avoid the donor site complications of an iliac crest harvest [9][10][11]. The purpose of this study is to identify if the bone fusion rates differ between the two groups by examining X-ray images taken at interval follow-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complication rate reported in the literature varies widely, ranging from 1% to 25 % for major complications and 9.4% to 39% for minor complications [2,8,18,21]. Major complications included large haematoma, wound infection, reoperation, unsightly scar, severe pain interfering with daily activity, and chronic pain limiting physical function [2,18,25]. Minor complications included dysaesthesia, prolonged wound drainage, and superficial infection [2,18,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this procedure is accompanied by many complications because of longer operative time and greater blood loss [18,24]. Several studies have reported minor and major complications, with a wide range of incidences varying between 1% and 39% [2,8,18,20,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%