2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11854-020-0121-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local asymptotics for orthonormal polynomials on the unit circle via universality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For x in the interior of suppOE (the "bulk" of the support), at least when 0 .x/ is finite and positive, the universality limit typically takes the form [6,8,14,15,18] lim Universality limits holds far more generally than pointwise asymptotics for orthonormal polynomials, that at one stage were used to prove them. In a series of recent papers [7,[9][10][11], it was shown that one can go in the other direction, namely from universality limits, to "local ratio limits" for orthogonal polynomials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For x in the interior of suppOE (the "bulk" of the support), at least when 0 .x/ is finite and positive, the universality limit typically takes the form [6,8,14,15,18] lim Universality limits holds far more generally than pointwise asymptotics for orthonormal polynomials, that at one stage were used to prove them. In a series of recent papers [7,[9][10][11], it was shown that one can go in the other direction, namely from universality limits, to "local ratio limits" for orthogonal polynomials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary goal of this paper is to prove a converse of Theorem A, namely to show that local limits such as (1.12) imply a universality limit like (1.11). For measures on the unit circle this was undertaken in [10] -however the results necessarily take a quite different form.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has at least a simple zero at v = 0. However, this contradicts the universality limit, which shows (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…
There is a mistake in the proof of Lemma 4.2(a) in [1], namely there t jn z jn = 1, so that the denominator in K n (z jn , t jn ) is 0. This causes a gap in the proofs of Lemma 4.3(d), and Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 (but not Theorems 1.3 and 1.4).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) The main ideas underlying the results of this paper are universality limits for reproducing kernels (see [10], [12] and [27]) and local limits for ratios of orthogonal polynomials (see [13]).…”
Section: § 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%