2008
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-8-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and regional factors influence the structure of treehole metacommunities

Abstract: Background: Abiotic and biotic factors in a local habitat may strongly impact the community residing within, but spatially structured metacommunities are also influenced by regional factors such as immigration and colonization. We used three years of monthly treehole census data to evaluate the relative influence of local and regional factors on our study system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of prey to escape from predation within and between habitats allows regional coexistence of predator and prey in a metacommunity. Such regional coexistence has been demonstrated in treehole metacommunities (Ellis et al 2006, Paradise et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability of prey to escape from predation within and between habitats allows regional coexistence of predator and prey in a metacommunity. Such regional coexistence has been demonstrated in treehole metacommunities (Ellis et al 2006, Paradise et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The amount of available habitat may also provide large numbers of refugia or increase habitat heterogeneity, decreasing predation effects by increasing growth rates of prey populations or decreasing efficiency of prey capture (Kitching 2000, Costanzo et al 2005. Prey species with altered behavior in the presence of the predator or wider habitat preferences than predators are known factors affecting survival of prey species in local communities and in the metacommunity (Juliano and Gravel 2002, Paradise 2004, Paradise et al 2008. The ability of prey to escape from predation within and between habitats allows regional coexistence of predator and prey in a metacommunity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a strong indication that forest habitat functions as source habitat for container breeding mosquito-predator communities. Source habitat is important for the colonization of predator species into new habitats (Levins 1969;Namba, Umemoto, & Minami 1999;Frouz & Kindlmann 2001) and this is especially true for ephemeral habitats like water-filled containers or other rain-filled mosquito breeding habitats (Caudill 2003;Paradise et al 2008). A lack of predator source habitat can lead to increased prey densities, when prey metapopulations are not dependent on the same source habitat or habitat quality as their predator (Ryall & Fahrig 2006;Shulman & Chase 2007;Chase & Shulman 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Natural communities may be regulated by local factors, such as competition, disturbances, biotic and abiotic variables, and regional factors, such as geographical distance among patches, dispersal capacity among habitats and climate conditions (Hillebrand & Blenckner, 2002;Cottenie et al, 2003;Paradise et al, 2008). These processes, acting in broad temporal and spatial scales, are important in determining diversity patterns and define the aspects of the regional species pool from where local communities are assembled (Caley & Schluter, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of floral stimuli produced by the plants (floral volatiles) reach long distances attracting pollinators (Reisenman et al, 2010) increasing dispersal rates and colonization among plants (Kneitel & Miller, 2003). During the flowering phase, these stimuli (i. e. floral volatiles and nectar) are critical for insects to choose suitable oviposition sites, leading to higher rates of oviposition in the plants (Reisenman et al, 2010) and decreasing the influence of spatial distance on the structure of the aquatic larvae associated to phytotelmata (Paradise et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%