2016
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and Landscape Factors Driving the Structure of Tropical Anuran Communities: Do Ephemeral Ponds have a Nested Pattern?

Abstract: The sets of species in animal and plant communities often comprise nested subsets of the species in broader communities. Although most mechanisms causing nested patterns are known and have been demonstrated for different environments and taxa, how amphibian communities are structured in ephemeral ponds in tropical disturbed landscapes remains unknown. We investigated if pond size, duration, presence of trees (local factors), and the proportion of forest cover surrounding ponds (landscape factor) affect anuran … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered forest‐dependent species as those that are mainly found in forest areas even if some of them are occasionally found in matrix areas (Almeida‐Gomes & Rocha, ; Almeida‐Gomes, Vieira et al., ; Haddad et al., ). Generalist species were those found in both forest and matrix areas, most of them being common in disturbed habitats (Almeida‐Gomes, Rocha & Vieira, ). This classification relies on previous samplings in pasture matrix in the same study area (Almeida‐Gomes & Rocha, ; Almeida‐Gomes, Rocha et al., ) and available information for Atlantic Forest frogs (Haddad et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We considered forest‐dependent species as those that are mainly found in forest areas even if some of them are occasionally found in matrix areas (Almeida‐Gomes & Rocha, ; Almeida‐Gomes, Vieira et al., ; Haddad et al., ). Generalist species were those found in both forest and matrix areas, most of them being common in disturbed habitats (Almeida‐Gomes, Rocha & Vieira, ). This classification relies on previous samplings in pasture matrix in the same study area (Almeida‐Gomes & Rocha, ; Almeida‐Gomes, Rocha et al., ) and available information for Atlantic Forest frogs (Haddad et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalist species were those found in both forest and matrix areas, most of them being common in disturbed habitats (Almeida‐Gomes, Rocha & Vieira, ). This classification relies on previous samplings in pasture matrix in the same study area (Almeida‐Gomes & Rocha, ; Almeida‐Gomes, Rocha et al., ) and available information for Atlantic Forest frogs (Haddad et al., ). Analyses were performed for forest and generalist species separately as we expect they respond differently to forested habitat amount.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nature conservation programmes typically aim at safeguarding high levels of regional diversity, which can only be achieved by having both high local diversity and high β-diversity (Socolar, Gilroy, Kunin, & Edwards, 2016). Nestedness refers to the situation where species-poor sites are subsets of species richer sites (Almeida-Gomes, Rocha, & Vieira, 2016;Almeida-Neto, Guimarães, Guimarães, Loyola, & Ulrich, 2008;Ulrich, 2009), whereas spatial turnover indicates species replacement among habitat patches (Baselga, 2010;Koleff & Gaston, 2002;Qian, Ricklefs, & White, 2005). Nestedness refers to the situation where species-poor sites are subsets of species richer sites (Almeida-Gomes, Rocha, & Vieira, 2016;Almeida-Neto, Guimarães, Guimarães, Loyola, & Ulrich, 2008;Ulrich, 2009), whereas spatial turnover indicates species replacement among habitat patches (Baselga, 2010;Koleff & Gaston, 2002;Qian, Ricklefs, & White, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beta-diversity can further be partitioned into its components of nestedness and spatial turnover (Baselga, 2010). Nestedness refers to the situation where species-poor sites are subsets of species richer sites (Almeida-Gomes, Rocha, & Vieira, 2016;Almeida-Neto, Guimarães, Guimarães, Loyola, & Ulrich, 2008;Ulrich, 2009), whereas spatial turnover indicates species replacement among habitat patches (Baselga, 2010;Koleff & Gaston, 2002;Qian, Ricklefs, & White, 2005). Partitioning β-diversity into its nestedness and spatial turnover components is effective to reveal causative processes that determine patterns of β-diversity (Baselga, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies considering the effect of rainfall on seasonal growth and survival have focused on seasonal or annual weather patterns [10][11][12]; but whereas such large-scale rainfall trends can be useful in explaining community level dynamics [13], they may not reveal the specific mechanisms driving individual mortality. In order to elucidate the effect of short term environmental fluctuations on growth and development, rainfall patterns should be considered on a much shorter timescale [2,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%