2011
DOI: 10.1118/1.3556590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and global 3D noise power spectrum in cone‐beam CT system with FDK reconstruction

Abstract: Purpose:The authors examine the nonstationary noise behavior of a cone-beam CT system with FDK reconstruction. Methods: To investigate the nonstationary noise behavior, an analytical expression for the NPS of local volumes and an entire volume was derived and quantitatively compared to the NPS estimated from experimental air and water images. Results: The NPS of local volumes at different locations along the z-axis showed radial symmetry in the f x -f y plane and different missing cone regions in the f z direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in contrast to FBP reconstruction which carries uniform spatial resolution to the extent described by Eq. (9), recognizing the potential for nonuniform spatial resolution associated with sampling 13,14 and modified FDK algorithms with shift-variant filters. 50 The PSF at each voxel in a neighborhood N is assumed to be the same, or equivalently, the system is locally shift-invariant.…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is in contrast to FBP reconstruction which carries uniform spatial resolution to the extent described by Eq. (9), recognizing the potential for nonuniform spatial resolution associated with sampling 13,14 and modified FDK algorithms with shift-variant filters. 50 The PSF at each voxel in a neighborhood N is assumed to be the same, or equivalently, the system is locally shift-invariant.…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S proj denotes the 2D projection NPS, Conversion gain from x-rays to secondary quanta (e.g., optical photons) P k Gain and spreading factors associated with K-fluorescence T 3 Transfer function due to stochastic spread of secondary quantā g 4 Coupling efficiency of photodiode a pd Width of (square) photodiode T 5 Transfer function due to photodiode aperture III 6 Detector pixel sampling (2D comb function) σ add Additive electronics noise III 8 Postreadout projection resampling (optional) T 8 Transfer function due to 2D binning aperture (optional) T 10 Ramp filter T 11 Apodization filter T 12 Interpolation filter T 13 Transfer function associated with backprojection of signal 13 Transfer function associated with backprojection of noise III 14 3D voxel sampling (3D comb function) III 15 Postreconstruction sampling (optional) T 15 Transfer function due to 3D binning aperture (optional) m Number of projections acquired across a circular orbit θ tot Total angular extent of acquisition M Magnification factor, source-detector distance (SDD)/source-axis distance (SAD) FOV Size of the reconstruction field of view…”
Section: B the Spatially-varying Nps And Mtf For Fbpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[71][72][73] These effects would need to be studied in the future, although experimental results presented in this work suggest that their effects may be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a fundamental understanding that the subject contrast of soft tissues in an imaging system is intrinsically determined by their interaction with the x-ray beam, [14][15][16] while the system's performance is determined by its signal and noise transfer properties. 11,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] In principle, the signal transfer property of an imaging system is dependent on its modulation transfer function MTF(k), [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] while the noise transfer property can only be thoroughly characterized by its noise power spectrum NPS(k), i.e., the variation of noise intensity as a function over spatial frequency k. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%