2018
DOI: 10.3390/f9060310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and General Above-Ground Biomass Functions for Pinus palustris Trees

Abstract: Abstract:There is an increasing interest in estimating biomass for longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.), an important tree species in the southeastern U.S. Most of the individual-tree allometric models available for the species are local, relying on stem diameter outside bark at breast height (DBH) and total tree height (HT), but seldom include stand-level variables such as stand age, basal area or stand density. Using the biomass dataset of 296 longleaf pine trees sampled in the southeastern U.S. by differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…whereσ 2 is the estimated error sum of squares; ν i is the weighting variable (D, D 2 H in this study) associated with the i th sampled culm; and δ is the variance function coefficient to be estimated. When the models of each component and the AGB are fit independently the total biomass calculated from the component models is different from the estimate obtained from the independently developed AGB model [37][38][39]. Seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) can solve that limitation by allowing simultaneous estimation of the component biomass as well as AGB.…”
Section: Weighted Nonlinear Models Fit By Maximum Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…whereσ 2 is the estimated error sum of squares; ν i is the weighting variable (D, D 2 H in this study) associated with the i th sampled culm; and δ is the variance function coefficient to be estimated. When the models of each component and the AGB are fit independently the total biomass calculated from the component models is different from the estimate obtained from the independently developed AGB model [37][38][39]. Seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) can solve that limitation by allowing simultaneous estimation of the component biomass as well as AGB.…”
Section: Weighted Nonlinear Models Fit By Maximum Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) can solve that limitation by allowing simultaneous estimation of the component biomass as well as AGB. Additionally, the SUR takes into account the cross-equation correlation (i.e., correlation among error terms of the biomass equations) among the equations and ensures the additivity among components and AGB predictions [38][39][40][41]. The weighted nonlinear SUR was implemented by using SAS procedure Proc Model with the generalized least squares (GLS) method [21,42].…”
Section: Weighted Nonlinear Models Fit By Maximum Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dataset used in this study covered different locations in the southeastern United States, and the models reported here can be applied to a wide variety of ages and stands. However, since there was no information on thinning practices for the stands, the models should be used in conditions of no strong thinning influence, as recommended by Gonzalez-Benecke et al (2018).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canopy structure is an important ecosystem trait that governs the spatial and temporal distribution of light transmittance, impacting the composition, distribution, and productivity of the mid-and understory plant community. Accurately measuring and quantifying three-dimensional (3D) structural arrangement is indeed a long-standing and ever advancing subject that is foundational to many scientific investigations-especially relevant to dendrometry, allometry, and biomass estimation [1][2][3][4], light transmittance estimation [5][6][7][8], and wildland fire science [9][10][11][12]. In practice, canopy structure is typically measured indirectly using both passive and active remote sensing because direct sampling methods can be laborious, time consuming, and destructive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%