1996
DOI: 10.1109/90.541319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local anchor scheme for reducing signaling costs in personal communications networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Various strategies have been suggested by researchers to optimize the centralized approach. The Local Anchor (LA) Scheme, proposed by Ho and Akyildiz [5], reduces the signaling traffic by using a local anchor (a VLR, a mobile user is currently visiting when he/she receives a call). In this scheme, a VLR close to the user is selected as the local anchor (LA) for the user.…”
Section: Centralized Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies have been suggested by researchers to optimize the centralized approach. The Local Anchor (LA) Scheme, proposed by Ho and Akyildiz [5], reduces the signaling traffic by using a local anchor (a VLR, a mobile user is currently visiting when he/she receives a call). In this scheme, a VLR close to the user is selected as the local anchor (LA) for the user.…”
Section: Centralized Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must define some parameters in order to define the probability of handover in each scenario as discussed in [11] [12].…”
Section: The Probability Of Handovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis, the cost for MBSFN polling is differentiated from the cost for packet deliveries. Furthermore, in accordance with (Ho & Akyildiz, 1996), we make a further distinction between the processing costs at nodes and the transmission costs on links. For the analysis, we apply the notations presented in Before presenting in detail the parameters introduced in Table 1, some general assumptions of our analysis and the topology under examination are presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As performance metric for the evaluation, we consider the total telecommunication cost for both packet delivery and control signals transmission (Ho & Akyildiz, 1996). In our analysis, the cost for MBSFN polling is differentiated from the cost for packet deliveries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%