Local agglomeration, entrepreneurship and the 2008 recession: Evidence from Italian industrial districts

Abstract

We investigate whether the impact of recessions on entrepreneurship is affected by the presence of industrial districts, a source of local agglomeration economies. Using Italian Labour Force quarterly data from 2006 to 2011 and a "difference-in-differences" approach, we show that the share of entrepreneurs in local labour markets where industrial districts are present has declined more than in comparable areas after the beginning of the 2008 recession. The estimated negative differential effect ranges between 4.8 and 7.9 percent in absolute value. We examine alternative explanations -including differences in industrial specialisation and composition, access to credit propensity, exports, population density and the composition of talents -and conclude that our result is consistent with the intense social interactions typical of industrial districts, acting as a multiplier that amplifies the response to shocks.

Does Urban Industrial Agglomeration Lead to the Improvement of Land Use Efficiency in China? An Empirical Study from a Spatial Perspective

“…Knowledge spillover is the most important externality of industrial agglomeration that leads to innovations [13]. A typical case of specialization is the cluster of small-and medium-sized enterprises in Central and Northeastern Italy known as the 'Third Italy' [14]. Highly specialized division of labor force is formed due to the emergence of external economies.…”

Study of the development trajectory of the status indicator in employment in the context of digital transformation

“…Poland is the country where the share of self-employed people who noted that they are continuing a family business is the highest (26.6%), followed by Slovenia (25.5%), Austria and Greece (25.3% each). The lack of employment as an employee is also [19][20][21]. The orientation towards the self-employed shows that the economically dependent selfemployed especially want to work as employees (32.6%).…”

Self-employment over the business cycle in the USA: a decomposition

“…For example, Fairlie ( 2013 ) reports increasing entrepreneurship rates during the Great Recession in the USA, whereas Siemer ( 2019 ) documents a fall in employer firms in the same country at the same time, and Brunello and Langella ( 2016 ) find decreasing entrepreneurship rates in Italy. The explanation is that Fairlie ( 2013 ) uses a broad measure of entrepreneurship including unincorporated businesses, whereas Siemer ( 2019 ) only considers employer businesses, and Brunello and Langella ( 2016 ) use a narrow definition of entrepreneurship only including self-employed individuals who work as managers, professionals or in other skilled jobs. The narrower definitions in the latter two papers are closer to the specific measure of self-employment with incorporated businesses (see Shane 2014 ; Levine and Rubinstein 2017 ).…”