2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-015-0863-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local adaptation at fine spatial scales: an example from sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana, Pinaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While bayenv2 did not identify any loci strongly associated with environment, as given from small values of Bayes factors (all BF¯ < 1.0, Table S3, Supporting information), there is a strong biological signal for adaptation to soil water availability in our data set (discussed below), evidence that other white pines within the LTB are also being structured by precipitation differences among populations (Eckert et al . ), and elevated signals of selection among focal loci associated to annual precipitation which would be unlikely to arise, given the data and methodological artefacts. Thus, it seems unlikely that the focal sets of SNPs associated to annual precipitation, and perhaps GDD‐Aug and Tmin‐Jan, are driven solely by false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While bayenv2 did not identify any loci strongly associated with environment, as given from small values of Bayes factors (all BF¯ < 1.0, Table S3, Supporting information), there is a strong biological signal for adaptation to soil water availability in our data set (discussed below), evidence that other white pines within the LTB are also being structured by precipitation differences among populations (Eckert et al . ), and elevated signals of selection among focal loci associated to annual precipitation which would be unlikely to arise, given the data and methodological artefacts. Thus, it seems unlikely that the focal sets of SNPs associated to annual precipitation, and perhaps GDD‐Aug and Tmin‐Jan, are driven solely by false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Variation of allele frequencies among populations accounts for less than 1% of the variance observed, which was less than that found for P. lambertiana populations within the LTB (Eckert et al . ), or among isozymes sampled from populations across the Northern P. albicaulis range (Krakowski et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding how organisms adapt to their local environment is one of the key goals in molecular ecology (Bedford & Hartl, ; Chen et al., ; Dayan, Crawford, & Oleksiak, ; Fraser, ; Lenz, ; Pavey, Bernatchez, Aubin‐Horth, & Landry, ). The advent of NextGen sequencing made it possible to analyse, on a genome‐ or at least transcriptome‐wide scale, both fundamental mechanisms of surviving in an environment that changes in time and space: local adaptation (Csilléry et al., ; Dayan et al., ; Eckert et al., ; Fraser, ; Lavington et al., ; Simonson et al., ) and adaptive phenotypic plasticity (Bedford & Hartl, ; Chen, Nolte, & Schlötterer, ; Dayan et al., ; Klumpen et al., ; Rohlfs, Harrigan, & Nielsen, ; Schwerin et al., ; Yampolsky, Zeng et al., ). These two responses to environment—differentiation with respect to heritable changes and nonheritable physiological and biochemical changes—are often difficult to untangle in the field and, in case of differential mortality, even in laboratory studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limited differentiation was unexpected given that local adaptation along environmental gradients, even at relatively fine scales, is often observed for many of the species in our study, including Douglas fir (Campbell 1979, St Clair et al 2005, ponderosa pine (Kitzmiller 2005), and sugar pine (Eckert et al 2015). This limited differentiation was unexpected given that local adaptation along environmental gradients, even at relatively fine scales, is often observed for many of the species in our study, including Douglas fir (Campbell 1979, St Clair et al 2005, ponderosa pine (Kitzmiller 2005), and sugar pine (Eckert et al 2015).…”
Section: Limited Differentiation In Performance Among Other Provenancesmentioning
confidence: 70%