1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0940-2993(97)80006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lobule-dependent zonal measurement (LZM) method for the determination of cell proliferation in the liver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten to 15 fields were counted. The labeling indices of hepatocytes were determined in different zones as described previously (Bahnemann and Mellert, 1997). To guarantee lobule comparison, the distance from the portal tract to the central vein was determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten to 15 fields were counted. The labeling indices of hepatocytes were determined in different zones as described previously (Bahnemann and Mellert, 1997). To guarantee lobule comparison, the distance from the portal tract to the central vein was determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean distance between these vessels was ∼350 µm. The fields were subdivided into 3 equal parts (∼100 hepatocytes) corresponding to the lobule-dependent zonal measurement method (LZM) (Bahnemann and Mellert, 1997): periportal (zone 1), midzonal (zone 2), and perivenous (zone 3). Total LI was calculated as an average of all 3 zones.…”
Section: Evaluation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because liver regeneration is inhomogeneous within a liver lobe, but also between liver lobes, the selection and the total size of the ROIs to be analyzed can also influence the result of the BrdU-LI on the postanalytical level. Bahnemann and Mellert (1997) described the LZM method for determination of cell proliferation in the liver. According to the rules of the LZM method, measurement fields should be of equal size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total size of the ROI to be analyzed was determined by both the classical statistical approach based on the central limit theorem and the lobule-dependent zonal measurement (LZM) method (Bahnemann and Mellert 1997). A coefficient of variation (CV) of below 10% was considered to be acceptable, inasmuch as the biological variation between individual animals was much higher and can reach more than 30%, as already shown by Fabrikant as early as 1968 (Fabrikant 1968;Schmitz and Hof 2000).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Total Size Of The Roi To Be Analyzedmentioning
confidence: 99%