2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lobster and cod benefit from small-scale northern marine protected areas: inference from an empirical before–after control-impact study

Abstract: Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly implemented as tools to conserve and manage fisheries and target species. Because there are opportunity costs to conservation, there is a need for science-based assessment of MPAs. Here, we present one of the northernmost documentations of MPA effects to date, demonstrated by a replicated before–after control-impact (BACI) approach. In 2006, MPAs were implemented along the Norwegian Skagerrak coast offering complete protection to shellfish and partial protection t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
129
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(71 reference statements)
9
129
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For species with spawning or feeding migrations outside reserves, the strength of selection for increased site fidelity decreases with the amount of the life cycle protected by reserves (Miethe et al 2011). Providing circumstantial empirical support for this theory, increased site fidelity in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) can explain the observed increases in density and body size in reserves compared with harvested areas despite expectations for a high degree of connectivity across locations (Moland et al 2013). More directly, some tagging studies have shown decreased movement in reserves (e.g., see the sidebar, Long-Term Field Study: A Temperate Example).…”
Section: Protection Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For species with spawning or feeding migrations outside reserves, the strength of selection for increased site fidelity decreases with the amount of the life cycle protected by reserves (Miethe et al 2011). Providing circumstantial empirical support for this theory, increased site fidelity in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) can explain the observed increases in density and body size in reserves compared with harvested areas despite expectations for a high degree of connectivity across locations (Moland et al 2013). More directly, some tagging studies have shown decreased movement in reserves (e.g., see the sidebar, Long-Term Field Study: A Temperate Example).…”
Section: Protection Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In 2012, Norway's first no-take marine reserve was established in the Tvedestrand fjord between our Arendal and Risør study sites, spanning 1.5 km 2 of the inner fjord habitat and including a major cod spawning and nursery area (Ciannelli et al 2010). Marine reserves are generally not considered for highly migratory species such as Atlantic cod, but what we now know about movement and dispersal of Skagerrak coastal cod suggests that even a relatively small reserve could be an effective conservation tool in this region, protecting sedentary adults from harvest (see also Moland et al 2013). However, any spill-over benefits to fishers outside the reserve will de pend on relative dispersal rates of eggs and larvae into and out of the reserve (Botsford et al 2003), which likely vary among inshore versus exposed areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…before-after control-impact; e.g. Moland et al 2013) are required to properly demonstrate the impacts of lobster stocking (Ellis et al 2015a).…”
Section: Implications For Fisheries Management and Hatchery Stockingmentioning
confidence: 99%