Lobbying-Forschung und Interessengruppeneinfluss

Schiffers, Maximilian

doi:10.1007/s41358-016-0065-9

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By providing evidence in the particular case of German accessible housing politics, I contribute to the discourse of empirically hard‐to‐explore and assess interest group influence (Pagliari & Young, 2020; Schiffers, 2016, pp. 482–483).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both identity and business groups have specific resources to help them assert their interests in accessible housing politics. Besides so‐called classical resources such as money, time, and knowledge (e.g., Chaqués‐Bonafont et al, 2021, p. 442; Schiffers, 2016, p. 482), I define four forms of “power” as corresponding resources. First, organizational power describes the number of members and, thus, the level of representation of an interest group (Ebbinghaus, 2019, p. 124).…”

Section: Theoretical Expectationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mind the housing inclusion gap: The voice of people with disabilities in German housing politics

Slavici

2023

European Policy Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accessible housing is essential for disabled and elderly people with physical restraints to live independently. In reality, however, there is a considerable lack of accessible housing in Germany. While investigating the reasons for this insufficient supply, this article discusses the underlying policy mix and scrutinizes German accessible housing politics. Based on 50 semi‐structured interviews in the two states Saxony‐Anhalt and Hesse, it identifies the weak political influence of disability lobbyists as the primary reason. Lacking structural, organizational, and institutional power, they do not get access to decision‐makers in housing politics but are labeled as social policy actors. On the other hand, housing and building industries have considerable resources to push their housing policy agenda. Nevertheless, the empirical findings clearly show the challenging endeavor of integrating social and building policies in accessible housing while contributing to the overarching understanding of politics in minor policy fields.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%