“…Consistent with this notion, the FFR imposed a minimum level of 8% capital adequacy in an effort to stabilize the financial system and to prevent losses (Barth et al, 2004). The rationale for this capital adequacy requirement is provided by Das and Ghosh (2006) who document a positive relationship between banking efficiency and capital adequacy and Niswander and Swanson (2000) find that banks with substandard or marginal capital adequacy ratios have higher operating costs. These results are consistent with the notion that well-capitalized banks are perceived to be relatively safe and have better credit risk management practices, which in turn lowers their cost of borrowing, leading to enhanced efficiency.…”
Section: Capital Adequacy and Banking Operating Efficiencymentioning
“…Consistent with this notion, the FFR imposed a minimum level of 8% capital adequacy in an effort to stabilize the financial system and to prevent losses (Barth et al, 2004). The rationale for this capital adequacy requirement is provided by Das and Ghosh (2006) who document a positive relationship between banking efficiency and capital adequacy and Niswander and Swanson (2000) find that banks with substandard or marginal capital adequacy ratios have higher operating costs. These results are consistent with the notion that well-capitalized banks are perceived to be relatively safe and have better credit risk management practices, which in turn lowers their cost of borrowing, leading to enhanced efficiency.…”
Section: Capital Adequacy and Banking Operating Efficiencymentioning
“…Furthermore, prior research suggests that larger firms are associated with larger agency problems (Gabor 1985), suggesting that the firm size plays an important role in managerial decisions. Based on these arguments, we expect the large publicly traded banks to manage reported earnings more than the small banks (also see Beatty et al 2002;Niswander and Swanson 2000). This expectation is tested on the following hypothesis: H1: LLP is positively associated with EBTP (earnings before taxes and provisions for LLP) and the positive association is stronger for large banks than small banks.…”
Section: Impact Of Bank Size On the Association Of Llp With Earnings mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhatt 1996;Kim and Kross 1998;Greenawalt and Sinkey 1988;Niswander and Swanson 2000;Beatty et al 2002). In order to have a better insight into the association between LLP and earnings, Wahlen (1994) differentiated between discretionary and non-discretionary components of LLP, and find that the discretionary component is positively associated with current pre-LLP earnings.…”
“…Likewise, Niswander and Swanson [7], using call report data, financial reporting the Loan Provision portion was approved by the level of bank capital, income, and tax. In a sample of 11,000 banks, they show that banks below the capital adequacy threshold often make discretionary choices that reduce income and capital.…”
The purpose of the study is to analysis wheter management did Earning Management with approach discretionary loss loan provision and use 5 indicator of bank operation performance at bank sharia for the period 2011 -2016. Based on empirical result from the bank sharia financial report, the study find: (1) the two earnings-related variables, namely earnings before loan loss provisions and one-year-ahead earnings, are significantly related to discretionary loan loss provision; (2) non-performing loans ratio is are not found to be significantly linked to discretionary loan loss provisions, but bad debts coverage ratio and capital adeuqcy ratio are significantly linked to discretionary loan loss provisions. Finally, our findings indicate that bank managers may use discretionary loan loss provisions to engage in earnings management when the earnings before loan loss provisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.