2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-002-8745-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-Unload Response Ratio and Accelerating Moment/Energy Release Critical Region Scaling and Earthquake Prediction

Abstract: -The main idea of the Load-Unload Response Ratio (LURR) is that when a system is stable, its response to loading corresponds to its response to unloading, whereas when the system is approaching an unstable state, the response to loading and unloading becomes quite different. High LURR values and observations of Accelerating Moment/Energy Release (AMR/AER) prior to large earthquakes have led different research groups to suggest intermediate-term earthquake prediction is possible and imply that the LURR and AMR/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore not by coincidence that the scaling relation between the critical region size and the magnitude of the final event (Bowman et al, 1998), estimated from the time-tofailure function model, agrees with that estimated from the load-unload response ratio model (Yin et al, 2002). The empirical scaling relation found by Bowman et al (1998) can be approximated in terms of the critical region radius R c and the rupture area S of the final event as follows (Rundle et al, 2000):…”
Section: Physical Modeling For Intermediate-term Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is therefore not by coincidence that the scaling relation between the critical region size and the magnitude of the final event (Bowman et al, 1998), estimated from the time-tofailure function model, agrees with that estimated from the load-unload response ratio model (Yin et al, 2002). The empirical scaling relation found by Bowman et al (1998) can be approximated in terms of the critical region radius R c and the rupture area S of the final event as follows (Rundle et al, 2000):…”
Section: Physical Modeling For Intermediate-term Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…LURR thus defined represents a measure of the proximity to the critical state, and high LURR values (> 1) indicate that the region is in close proximity to the critical state that has a potential to cause a major earthquake. Values for LURR have been calculated for various regions of different tectonic regimes (Yin et al, 2000(Yin et al, , 2002, and the results indicate that the model provides a useful means for intermediate-term forecasting (Yin et al, 2000(Yin et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Physical Modeling For Intermediate-term Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M denotes the magnitude of the earthquake (YIN et al, 2002;2004a). In earthquake prediction practice, the equation can also be adopted to evaluate the magnitude of an earthquake.…”
Section: Predictive Applicability Of State Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Till date we have made tremendous achievement in real earthquake prediction practice using LURR, especially for medium term earthquake prediction (e.g. one-year time scale) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%