2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load sharing behavior in epicyclic gears: Physical explanation and generalized formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
102
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kahraman et al studied statics load sharing characteristic of the planetary transmission systems [1][2][3][4]; Singh established analysis model of the load sharing characteristic of the planetary transmission systems [5,6]; Wink and Sepra studied the method of tooth surface load distribution [7]; Bao et al studied the static load sharing characteristics of star gear and closed differential transmission systems [8,9]; Du et al studied the load sharing characteristics of the planetary transmission systems and dual power splitting systems [10,11]; and Mo et al researched the natural characteristics of double-helical star gearing system for GTF aeroengine and load sharing behavior of wind turbine gearbox [12][13][14][15]; Mantriota deals with the performance of power split transmissions in wind energy systems to identify the power split configurations that require the minimum rated power of the regulator system, to reduce costs and the power losses [16]. Zhu et al established a dynamic analysis model for 2-stage star gear train, where in the transmission error and the time-varying stiffness and backlash the nonlinear differential equations with multiple backlashes were considered and solved [17].…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kahraman et al studied statics load sharing characteristic of the planetary transmission systems [1][2][3][4]; Singh established analysis model of the load sharing characteristic of the planetary transmission systems [5,6]; Wink and Sepra studied the method of tooth surface load distribution [7]; Bao et al studied the static load sharing characteristics of star gear and closed differential transmission systems [8,9]; Du et al studied the load sharing characteristics of the planetary transmission systems and dual power splitting systems [10,11]; and Mo et al researched the natural characteristics of double-helical star gearing system for GTF aeroengine and load sharing behavior of wind turbine gearbox [12][13][14][15]; Mantriota deals with the performance of power split transmissions in wind energy systems to identify the power split configurations that require the minimum rated power of the regulator system, to reduce costs and the power losses [16]. Zhu et al established a dynamic analysis model for 2-stage star gear train, where in the transmission error and the time-varying stiffness and backlash the nonlinear differential equations with multiple backlashes were considered and solved [17].…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a planet has an error "e" on the position of its pin hole, and all other planets are at their ideal position, then the force due to this error is given by (Singh, 2010):…”
Section: Effect Of Planet Position Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Singh A. [7], planetary gears with a floating sun can achieve better load sharing than nonfloating systems at the presence of misalignment.…”
Section: -1-2 Misalignment Load Sharing and Edge Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research by August and Kasuba [8] concludes that the nonfloating sun gear arrangement generally performs better than a floating sun gear for errorless gears. Their work and many other studies [7,10,11,51] evaluates the dynamic loads on gears without considering bearings.…”
Section: -5-planet-bearing Fatigue Damage Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%