1995
DOI: 10.2749/101686695780601619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-Carrying Capacity of Scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar comparisons between 2D and 3D models were made by Lindner and Frölich [97] who compared their results with DIN 4421 [98] and by Gylltoft and Norelius [99], Gylltoft and Mroz [100] and Weinhold [101].…”
Section: Proprietary Scaffolds With Individual Componentssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Similar comparisons between 2D and 3D models were made by Lindner and Frölich [97] who compared their results with DIN 4421 [98] and by Gylltoft and Norelius [99], Gylltoft and Mroz [100] and Weinhold [101].…”
Section: Proprietary Scaffolds With Individual Componentssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The authors concluded that for large frames, unless torsion failure occurs, then the effects of joint eccentricity are insignificant. In the scaffold study by Gylltoft and Mroz [21], the braces were represented as truss members with pinned joints connected to the standards, and the connections between other members were modelled as short finite elements with nonlinear stiffness in all directions.…”
Section: Previous Scaffold Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al [5,6] also did a non-linear analysis on scaffolding systems. Using ABAQUS, Mroz [7] analyzed perfectly straight shelf scaffolding, without imperfection taken into consideration. An Experimental study on a large full-scale scaffolding frame subjected to pattern loads with various load paths was performed by Weeser [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%