2020
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3814709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

lmfit/lmfit-py 1.0.1

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tabular data, celestial coordinates and time scales are handled using routines from the astropy 3 software package (The Astropy Collaboration et al 2018). The package lmfit 4 (Newville et al 2020) is used for non-linear least-squares minimization and parameter handling. For Bayesian data analysis techniques, we use the affine-invariant Markov chain Monte Carlo ensemble sampler by Goodman & Weare (2010) implemented in emcee 5 (Foreman-Mackey et al 2013) to generate samples from the posterior probability distribution.…”
Section: Implementation and Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabular data, celestial coordinates and time scales are handled using routines from the astropy 3 software package (The Astropy Collaboration et al 2018). The package lmfit 4 (Newville et al 2020) is used for non-linear least-squares minimization and parameter handling. For Bayesian data analysis techniques, we use the affine-invariant Markov chain Monte Carlo ensemble sampler by Goodman & Weare (2010) implemented in emcee 5 (Foreman-Mackey et al 2013) to generate samples from the posterior probability distribution.…”
Section: Implementation and Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all fits reported in this work, we used a Bayesian method to find an estimate of the posterior probability distribution, by using an Affine Invariant Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Ensemble sampler method as implemented in the Python packages lmfit [48] and emcee [49]. This allowed us to obtain accurate estimates of the error and the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are summarised in Table 1 and 𝑄 𝜙 images at a surface brightness of 0.7 and 1.3 mJy arcsec −2 , respectively, and their corresponding best fitting elliptical ring model. Newville et al 2020) to explore the posterior probability distribution of each of the parameters in our model. The values and uncertainties quoted in Table 1 correspond to the median and 1𝜎 quantiles of these probability distributions.…”
Section: Inferred Disc Geometry and Potential Flaring Of The Disc Sca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimize function of lmfit (version 1.0.1; Newville et al 2020) was used to fit our elliptical ring model to the data. Specifically, we minimised the radial distance between the cylindrical coordinates of the isophote and the elliptical ring at the same azimuthal angle.…”
Section: Inferred Disc Geometry and Potential Flaring Of The Disc Sca...mentioning
confidence: 99%