2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1204-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LMAP: Lightweight Multigene Analyses in PAML

Abstract: BackgroundUncovering how phenotypic diversity arises and is maintained in nature has long been a major interest of evolutionary biologists. Recent advances in genome sequencing technologies have remarkably increased the efficiency to pinpoint genes involved in the adaptive evolution of phenotypes. Reliability of such findings is most often examined with statistical and computational methods using Maximum Likelihood codon-based models (i.e., site, branch, branch-site and clade models), such as those available i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses were run with multiple starting values of both k (2,2.5,4) and u (0.1,1,2) to provide a check against local optimas. These analyses were automated using LMAP v1.0.0 (Maldonado et al, 2016).…”
Section: Selection Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were run with multiple starting values of both k (2,2.5,4) and u (0.1,1,2) to provide a check against local optimas. These analyses were automated using LMAP v1.0.0 (Maldonado et al, 2016).…”
Section: Selection Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed codon models implemented in PAML [51][52][53] and Datamonkey [54] together with amino acid models in TreeSAAP [55]. CODEML in PAML [51] implements likelihood ratio tests (LRT) for comparisons of sophisticated nested site-specific models calculated as twice the difference of the log likelihood between the two models following Chi square distribution with the degrees of freedom corresponding to the difference in the number of parameters between the nested model, i.e., null model and alternate model (positive selection).…”
Section: Positive Selection In Avian Tlrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Only a few codon‐based models available. b Maldonado et al, , https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1204-5. c Schott et al, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/059881. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%