1995
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016229014535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Although GPC can yield rapid and valuable kinetic data for the degradation of biodegradable polymers, the system, however, must be carefully calibrated to account for the variations in Mark-Houwink coefficients and in the response of the mass detector between the high and low MW polymers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 20 ] Random chain scission has the effect of dramatically reducing the average molecular weight of the polymer, while end chain scission more efficiently produces acidic byproducts. Experimental data has shown that both are necessary in modeling the degradation of polymer, [ 47,52–56 ] therefore we expand Equation to include both end and random chain scission, which is defined by the equations: dResdtbadbreak=[]ke1Cend+ke2CendCH+0.33emMask$$\begin{equation}\frac{{d{R}_{es}}}{{dt}} = \left[ {{k}_{e1}{C}_{end} + {k}_{e2}{C}_{end}{C}_{H + }} \right]\ Mask\end{equation}$$ dRrsdtbadbreak=[]kr1Ce+kr2CeCH+0.33emMask$$\begin{equation}\frac{{d{R}_{rs}}}{{dt}} = \left[ {{k}_{r1}{C}_e + {k}_{r2}{C}_e{C}_{H + }} \right]\ Mask\end{equation}$$ dRsdtbadbreak=dResdt0.33emgoodbreak+dRrsdt$$\begin{equation}\frac{{d{R}_s}}{{dt}} = \frac{{d{R}_{es}}}{{dt}}\ + \frac{{d{R}_{rs}}}{{dt}}\end{equation}$$where R es is end chain scission, k e 1 is the non‐catalytic end scission rate constant, C end is the concentration of terminal ester bonds available for end chain scission, k e 2 is the auto‐catalytic end scission rate constant, R rs is random chain scission, k r 1 is the non‐catalytic random scission rate constant, C e is the concentration of interior ester bonds available for random chain scission, and k r 2 is the auto‐catalytic random scission rate constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[ 20 ] Random chain scission has the effect of dramatically reducing the average molecular weight of the polymer, while end chain scission more efficiently produces acidic byproducts. Experimental data has shown that both are necessary in modeling the degradation of polymer, [ 47,52–56 ] therefore we expand Equation to include both end and random chain scission, which is defined by the equations: dResdtbadbreak=[]ke1Cend+ke2CendCH+0.33emMask$$\begin{equation}\frac{{d{R}_{es}}}{{dt}} = \left[ {{k}_{e1}{C}_{end} + {k}_{e2}{C}_{end}{C}_{H + }} \right]\ Mask\end{equation}$$ dRrsdtbadbreak=[]kr1Ce+kr2CeCH+0.33emMask$$\begin{equation}\frac{{d{R}_{rs}}}{{dt}} = \left[ {{k}_{r1}{C}_e + {k}_{r2}{C}_e{C}_{H + }} \right]\ Mask\end{equation}$$ dRsdtbadbreak=dResdt0.33emgoodbreak+dRrsdt$$\begin{equation}\frac{{d{R}_s}}{{dt}} = \frac{{d{R}_{es}}}{{dt}}\ + \frac{{d{R}_{rs}}}{{dt}}\end{equation}$$where R es is end chain scission, k e 1 is the non‐catalytic end scission rate constant, C end is the concentration of terminal ester bonds available for end chain scission, k e 2 is the auto‐catalytic end scission rate constant, R rs is random chain scission, k r 1 is the non‐catalytic random scission rate constant, C e is the concentration of interior ester bonds available for random chain scission, and k r 2 is the auto‐catalytic random scission rate constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where R ol is the total concentration of short polymer chains produced over reaction time, C e0 is the initial concentration of interior ester bonds and l is the length in ester bonds of the oligomer chain. [ 56,58 ] In this work we continue by applying equation to evaluate the production of oligomers, while Pan et al. continues by generalizing Equation to allow for empirical tuning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations