1995
DOI: 10.1159/000475126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

lleocystoplasty in Children: Assessing Safety and Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported rates of bladder perforation following augmentation range between 6-13% (9,22,(46)(47)(48)(49). Perforation occurs due to increased intravesical pressure, which may result from chronic bladder over-distention, chronic infection, traumatic catheterization, and ischemic necrosis of the intestinal segment used for the augmentation (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56).…”
Section: Perforationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported rates of bladder perforation following augmentation range between 6-13% (9,22,(46)(47)(48)(49). Perforation occurs due to increased intravesical pressure, which may result from chronic bladder over-distention, chronic infection, traumatic catheterization, and ischemic necrosis of the intestinal segment used for the augmentation (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56).…”
Section: Perforationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of time from surgery to perforation can vary from the first few days following surgery to 6 years post-operatively (Metcalfe et al, 2006). Research evidence has been unable to clearly demonstrate whether the section of GI tract influences Abes et al, 2003 Diverse sample diagnosis Ahmed et al, 2002 Bladder extrophy sample Arikan et al, 2000 Diverse sample diagnosis Bertschy et al, 2000 Diverse sample diagnosis Blackburn et al, 2012 Bladder extrophy sample Blavias et al, 2005 Bladder augmentation as adult Boylu et al, 2006 Diverse sample diagnosis Chen and Kuo, 2009 Bladder augmentation as adult Chartier-Kastler et al, 2000 Bladder augmentation as adult Daher et al, 2007 Diverse sample diagnosis Feng et al, 2002 Bladder extrophy sample Franke et al, 2011 Diverse sample diagnosis Gerharz et al, 2003 Myelomeningocele diagnosis excluded Hamid et al, 2009 Vast age range up to old age, varied diagnoses Hendren and Hendren, 1990 Diverse sample diagnosis Herschorn and Hewitt, 1998 Bladder augmentation as adult Husmann and Rathburn, 2008 Diverse sample diagnosis Kalloo et al, 1997 Small sample with varying diagnosis and limited statistical analysis Kilic et al, 1999 Extrophy, posterior urethral value and cloacal anomaly sample Kockum et al, 1999 Diverse sample diagnosis Krishna et al, 1995 Diverse sample diagnosis with limited statistical analysis Lima et al, 2004 Bladder augmentation as adult Lopez Pereira et al, 2008 Results not discussed in relation to diagnosis and limited statistical analysis Mast et al, 1995 Diverse sample diagnosis, age range at time of surgery up to 54 years Obermayr et al, 2011 Diverse sample diagnosis Quek and Ginsberg, 2003 Number of sample had bladder augmentation as an adult Rosenbaum et al, 2008 Sample diagnosis not provided Taskinen et al, 2008a Cloacal sample Taskinen et al, 2008b Cloacal sample…”
Section: Bladder Perforation Following Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans la grande majorité des cas, un cathétérisme intermittent pluriquotidien est à associer [24]. Toutes les études retrouvent une amélio-ration significative de la capacité et de la compliance [18,19,[29][30][31][32][33][34] ainsi qu'une amélioration significative de la qualité de vie [35,36]. La continence urinaire de jour et de nuit est obtenue dans 70 à 95 % des cas [24,27,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Entérocystoplastie D'agrandissementunclassified