1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008920512663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools offer different stages of automation. Some require the user to input details regarding the part geometry [34,35]. However, most software-based approaches use automated analyses to retrieve the required part parameters.…”
Section: Dfam Design Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools offer different stages of automation. Some require the user to input details regarding the part geometry [34,35]. However, most software-based approaches use automated analyses to retrieve the required part parameters.…”
Section: Dfam Design Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of a knowledge model and an inference system. Certain knowledge can be represented by rule-based models [23], case-based models, and ontology [24]. Uncertain knowledge can be represented by Bayesian networks [25] and fuzzy logic [26].…”
Section: Typical Ai Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first tools for AM process selection was developed by Bibb et al (1999), focusing specifically on AM as a means of rapid prototyping. This knowledge based tool provided guidance based on data on part geometry, process capability, production volume and the physical properties of the components.…”
Section: Approaches For Selecting Between Am Materials and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite material and process selection for AM receiving attention since the late 1990s (Bibb et al 1999), only a limited number of approaches have been proposed to support the selection process between conventional materials and processes and AM materials and processes. Different studies have highlighted how AM can be, in some circumstances, the most suitable manufacturing route (Atzeni et al 2010;Sonova 2017).…”
Section: Am In Generic Materials and Process Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%