2015
DOI: 10.1075/ll.1.1-2.03bla
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LL explorations and methodological challenges

Abstract: The methodologies employed over these first years of LL research have evolved rapidly in several different directions, although quantitative and/or qualitative approaches have guided most published scholarship thus far. The quantitative approach has come to be reduced in one particular narrative to the counting of signs, whilst qualitative research is portrayed as permitting analysis of a selection of signs from which wider conclusions can be drawn. Using an on-going project into France’s regional languages in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Backhaus (2007), we define a sign as "any piece of text within a spatially definable frame" (66) and recorded signs that were visible from the perspective of a passerby on the sidewalk. While this approach may have left out smaller signs (such as stickers or business cards) present in Pilsen's LL, we follow the point brought up in Huebner (2009) and re-addressed in Blackwood (2015) that it is problematic in a quantitative analysis to assign "equal weight" to significantly less visible signs (e.g. stickers) and larger signs (e.g.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Following Backhaus (2007), we define a sign as "any piece of text within a spatially definable frame" (66) and recorded signs that were visible from the perspective of a passerby on the sidewalk. While this approach may have left out smaller signs (such as stickers or business cards) present in Pilsen's LL, we follow the point brought up in Huebner (2009) and re-addressed in Blackwood (2015) that it is problematic in a quantitative analysis to assign "equal weight" to significantly less visible signs (e.g. stickers) and larger signs (e.g.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This has seen a general departure from 'counting signs' (Blackwood, 2015) towards more focussed analyses of smaller numbers of objects. Whilst such an approach undoubtedly captures the superdiverse details exhibited in parts of the LL, it does not permit a comparative evaluation of multiple data within this.…”
Section: Ll: a Methodological Battlegroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level of granularity has been encouraged in the qualitative arm of the field (Coupland & Garrett, 2010;Kallen, 2010;Leeman & Modan, 2009), though it has yet to be applied quantitatively. Rather, a fallback to the qualitative suggests that the complexity of variation in the LL is not easily adapted into an empirical model (Blackwood, 2015).…”
Section: Research Questions and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (Blackwood 2015;Pavlenko 2010) have taken a diachronic approach to the study of LL. The analysis in this article draws on diachronic website data collected with the help of The Internet Archive, tracing the developments in the use of different languages on the websites of the three Norwegian state institutions from their respective year of launch until 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%