2006
DOI: 10.3138/jcfs.37.3.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Living Together or Communicating at a Distance: Structural and Associational Solidarity Between Mid-life Parent and Adult Child in New Zealand

Abstract: This article draws on the theoretical construct of micro-level intergenerational solidarity developed by Bengtson and others to establish the factors influencing the associative and structural dimensions of solidarity for the dyad of mid-life parent and young adult child. This dyadic relationship may be subject to the constraining effects of responsibilities associated with mid-life, and the increasingly complex process associated with youth transition to adulthood, suggesting the potential for weakened interg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intergenerational solidarity paradigm, though developed and validated with data from the United States, has been used in many countries around the world-for example, in Japan (Koyano, 1996), Germany (Steinbach, 2008), the Netherlands (Van Gaalen & Dykstra, 2006), New Zealand (Hillcoat-Nalletamby, Dharmalingam, & Baxendine, 2006), and Canada (Rosenthal, 1987). Formal cross-national comparisons using the solidarity paradigm have been carried out between an urban center in the United States and Wales (Silverstein, Burholt, Wenger, & Bengtson, 1998); between the recently reunified East and West Germany (Szydlik, 1996); and among England, Germany, Israel, Norway, and Spain (Daatland & Herlofson, 2003;Lowenstein, 2007).…”
Section: Multinational Applications Of the Solidarity -Conflict Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intergenerational solidarity paradigm, though developed and validated with data from the United States, has been used in many countries around the world-for example, in Japan (Koyano, 1996), Germany (Steinbach, 2008), the Netherlands (Van Gaalen & Dykstra, 2006), New Zealand (Hillcoat-Nalletamby, Dharmalingam, & Baxendine, 2006), and Canada (Rosenthal, 1987). Formal cross-national comparisons using the solidarity paradigm have been carried out between an urban center in the United States and Wales (Silverstein, Burholt, Wenger, & Bengtson, 1998); between the recently reunified East and West Germany (Szydlik, 1996); and among England, Germany, Israel, Norway, and Spain (Daatland & Herlofson, 2003;Lowenstein, 2007).…”
Section: Multinational Applications Of the Solidarity -Conflict Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%